The Ultimate Showdown: Intel Celeron N2840 Vs I3 – Which One Is The Real Deal?

In the realm of budget-friendly computing, the Intel Celeron N2840 and i3 processors often emerge as contenders for powering laptops, desktops, and mini PCs. While both offer affordability, they cater to distinct user needs and application requirements. This comprehensive comparison delves into the intricacies of these processors, highlighting their strengths, weaknesses, and suitability for various tasks.

At the heart of the performance debate lies the fundamental difference in core count and architecture. The Intel Celeron N2840 is a quad-core processor built on the 22nm Silvermont architecture, while the i3 processors vary in core count and architecture depending on the generation. For instance, the 7th-generation i3-7100U is a dual-core processor based on the Kaby Lake architecture, while the 11th-generation i3-1115G4 boasts four cores and the Willow Cove architecture.

In general, the higher core count and more advanced architecture of the i3 processors result in superior performance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications. The additional cores allow for better multitasking and handling of demanding workloads, making them ideal for tasks like video editing, graphic design, and programming.

Benchmark Scores: Quantifying the Performance Gap

To provide a quantitative assessment of the performance difference, we turn to benchmark scores. In the popular Cinebench R20 benchmark, the i3-7100U scores approximately 280 points in the single-core test and 650 points in the multi-core test. The Celeron N2840, on the other hand, manages around 100 points in the single-core test and 250 points in the multi-core test.

Similarly, in the Geekbench 5 benchmark, the i3-1115G4 achieves a single-core score of around 1200 points and a multi-core score of 4000 points, while the Celeron N2840 scores approximately 600 points in the single-core test and 1200 points in the multi-core test.

These benchmark results underscore the significant performance advantage of the i3 processors over the Celeron N2840, particularly in multi-threaded applications that can leverage the additional cores and advanced architecture.

Power Consumption and Thermal Efficiency: Balancing Performance and Battery Life

The Intel Celeron N2840 is renowned for its exceptional power efficiency, consuming a mere 7.5 watts of TDP (Thermal Design Power). This makes it an ideal choice for devices that prioritize long battery life, such as laptops and tablets. In contrast, the i3 processors typically have a TDP of 15 watts or higher, resulting in increased power consumption and heat generation.

The lower power consumption of the Celeron N2840 also translates to cooler operating temperatures, reducing the need for robust cooling solutions and enabling fanless designs in compact devices.

Graphics Performance: Assessing Visual Prowess

When it comes to graphics performance, the i3 processors generally have an edge over the Celeron N2840. The i3 processors feature integrated Intel HD Graphics or Iris Xe Graphics, which provide better support for modern games and graphics-intensive applications. The Celeron N2840, on the other hand, relies on the Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), which is less capable in handling demanding graphical tasks.

Suitability for Different Applications: Matching Needs with Performance

The choice between the Intel Celeron N2840 and i3 processors hinges on the intended use of the device. For basic tasks like web browsing, email, and office productivity, the Celeron N2840 is a capable and cost-effective option. Its low power consumption makes it suitable for devices that prioritize battery life.

On the other hand, users who require more performance for demanding applications like video editing, graphic design, programming, or gaming should opt for an i3 processor. The additional cores, higher clock speeds, and improved graphics capabilities of the i3 processors make them better suited for these tasks.

Price and Availability: Considering Budget and Accessibility

The Intel Celeron N2840 is typically found in budget-friendly laptops, desktops, and mini PCs, with prices starting around $200. The i3 processors, on the other hand, command a higher price tag, with laptops typically starting at around $400.

The availability of these processors may also vary depending on the region and market demand.

Wrapping Up: Choosing the Right Processor for Your Needs

Ultimately, the decision between the Intel Celeron N2840 and i3 processors boils down to your specific needs and budget constraints. If you prioritize affordability, long battery life, and basic computing tasks, the Celeron N2840 is a solid choice. However, if you require more performance for demanding applications, the i3 processors are the way to go.

—

Beyond the Comparison: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Q: Can I upgrade my laptop’s processor from Celeron N2840 to i3?

A: Processor upgrades are typically not possible due to the way they are soldered onto the motherboard. Upgrading would require a new motherboard and processor, which is often not cost-effective.

2. Q: Is the i3 processor good for gaming?

A: The performance of i3 processors varies depending on the generation and model. Some i3 processors, especially those with higher core counts and clock speeds, can handle casual gaming and esports titles. However, for more demanding AAA games, a more powerful processor like an i5 or i7 is recommended.

3. Q: How much RAM do I need for an i3 processor?

A: The amount of RAM needed depends on the specific applications you plan to run. For basic tasks like web browsing and office productivity, 4GB of RAM is sufficient. For more demanding applications like video editing and graphic design, 8GB or more RAM is recommended.