Processor Showdown: Intel Celeron N4020 Vs Intel Atom X5-z8350 – Which One Reigns Supreme?
What To Know
- In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the key differences between the Intel Celeron N4020 and Intel Atom x5-Z8350, helping you make an informed decision about which processor best suits your needs.
- The Intel Celeron N4020 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 watts, while the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 has a TDP of 2 watts.
- However, users who engage in more demanding tasks, such as video editing, graphic design, or multitasking, will likely find the Celeron N4020 to be a better choice.
In the realm of budget-friendly processors, the Intel Celeron N4020 and Intel Atom x5-Z8350 stand out as two compelling options. These processors are often found in affordable laptops, tablets, and mini PCs, catering to users who prioritize value and everyday performance over cutting-edge capabilities. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the key differences between the Intel Celeron N4020 and Intel Atom x5-Z8350, helping you make an informed decision about which processor best suits your needs.
Architecture and Core Configuration: A Tale of Two Designs
The Intel Celeron N4020 is built on the Gemini Lake Refresh architecture, utilizing a 14nm fabrication process. It features four processing cores with a base clock speed of 1.1GHz and a turbo boost speed of up to 2.8GHz. On the other hand, the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 employs the Cherry Trail architecture, manufactured using a 14nm process as well. It also has four processing cores, but with a lower base clock speed of 1.44GHz and a turbo boost speed of up to 1.92GHz.
Performance Comparison: Uncovering the Powerhouse
In terms of performance, the Intel Celeron N4020 holds a clear advantage over the Intel Atom x5-Z8350. The N4020’s higher clock speeds and improved architecture result in a noticeable performance boost in various applications. For basic tasks like web browsing, email handling, and office productivity, both processors deliver adequate performance. However, when it comes to more demanding tasks such as video editing, graphic design, or multitasking, the Celeron N4020 shines brighter.
Graphics Performance: Battling for Visual Supremacy
The Intel Celeron N4020 integrates the Intel UHD Graphics 600 GPU, while the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 utilizes the Intel HD Graphics 400 GPU. In terms of graphics performance, the UHD Graphics 600 offers a significant improvement over the HD Graphics 400. It can handle basic gaming at lower resolutions and settings, as well as video playback and basic image editing tasks. However, both GPUs are not suitable for demanding gaming or intensive graphics-related workloads.
Power Consumption and Efficiency: Balancing Performance and Battery Life
The Intel Celeron N4020 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 6 watts, while the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 has a TDP of 2 watts. This means that the Celeron N4020 consumes more power than the Atom x5-Z8350. However, the Celeron N4020’s higher performance often outweighs this disadvantage in terms of overall efficiency. For devices that prioritize extended battery life, the Atom x5-Z8350 may be a better choice.
Connectivity and Expansion Options: Exploring the I/O Landscape
The Intel Celeron N4020 supports a wide range of connectivity options, including multiple USB ports, HDMI output, and an SD card reader. The Intel Atom x5-Z8350 offers similar connectivity options, but it may have limitations in terms of the number and types of ports available. Additionally, the Celeron N4020 supports faster memory speeds and storage interfaces, allowing for smoother multitasking and data transfer.
Price and Availability: Striking a Balance between Cost and Value
The Intel Celeron N4020 and Intel Atom x5-Z8350 processors are both budget-friendly options, with the Atom x5-Z8350 typically being the more affordable choice. However, the Celeron N4020 often offers better performance and features, making it a more compelling choice for users who prioritize performance over price. Both processors are widely available in various laptops, tablets, and mini PCs, making it easy to find a device that suits your needs and budget.
Beyond the Numbers: Real-World Applications and Use Cases
In real-world applications, the Intel Celeron N4020 and Intel Atom x5-Z8350 processors perform adequately for basic computing tasks. They can handle everyday activities like web browsing, email, and office productivity without any major issues. However, users who engage in more demanding tasks, such as video editing, graphic design, or multitasking, will likely find the Celeron N4020 to be a better choice.
A Note on Upgradability and Longevity
Both the Intel Celeron N4020 and Intel Atom x5-Z8350 processors are soldered onto the motherboard, making them non-upgradable. This means that you cannot replace the processor with a more powerful one in the future. Therefore, it is important to carefully consider your needs and choose a device with a processor that can handle your current and future requirements.
What People Want to Know
Q: Which processor is better for gaming, the Intel Celeron N4020 or Intel Atom x5-Z8350?
A: Neither processor is suitable for demanding gaming. However, the Intel Celeron N4020 with its integrated Intel UHD Graphics 600 GPU can handle basic gaming at lower resolutions and settings.
Q: Can I upgrade the processor in a device with an Intel Celeron N4020 or Intel Atom x5-Z8350 processor?
A: No, both processors are soldered onto the motherboard and cannot be upgraded.
Q: Which processor is more power-efficient, the Intel Celeron N4020 or Intel Atom x5-Z8350?
A: The Intel Atom x5-Z8350 has a lower TDP (2 watts) compared to the Intel Celeron N4020 (6 watts), making it more power-efficient.
