Intel Atom Z3735f Vs Celeron N4020: Battle Of The Low-power Processors

In the realm of budget processors, two contenders stand out: the Intel Atom Z3735F and the Celeron N4020. Both are designed for low-power devices like laptops, tablets, and mini PCs, offering a balance of performance and affordability. But how do they compare against each other? Let’s dive into the details to find out which one comes out on top.

Performance: Celeron N4020 Takes the Lead

The Celeron N4020 boasts a clear advantage in terms of performance. It features four cores and four threads, compared to the Atom Z3735F’s two cores and two threads. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster application loading, and improved overall responsiveness. For basic tasks like web browsing, email, and office productivity, both processors can handle them without much hassle. However, the Celeron N4020’s extra cores and threads give it an edge in more demanding applications like video editing, photo manipulation, and light gaming.

Power Consumption: Atom Z3735F Sips Less Power

When it comes to power consumption, the Atom Z3735F shines. Its TDP (Thermal Design Power) is rated at a mere 2.2 watts, while the Celeron N4020’s TDP is 6 watts. This means the Atom Z3735F generates less heat and consumes less power, making it ideal for devices that prioritize battery life. Laptops and tablets equipped with the Atom Z3735F can potentially offer longer runtimes on a single charge compared to those powered by the Celeron N4020.

Graphics: Celeron N4020 Delivers Better Visuals

In terms of graphics capabilities, the Celeron N4020 once again takes the lead. It integrates the Intel UHD Graphics 600, while the Atom Z3735F relies on the Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail). The UHD Graphics 600 offers improved performance for both 2D and 3D graphics, resulting in smoother video playback, faster image rendering, and better gaming experiences. However, it’s important to note that neither processor is suitable for demanding graphics-intensive tasks like high-end gaming or video editing.

Features: Celeron N4020 Offers More Connectivity

The Celeron N4020 comes equipped with a wider range of connectivity features compared to the Atom Z3735F. It supports faster Wi-Fi speeds (802.11ac vs. 802.11n), Bluetooth 5.0 (vs. Bluetooth 4.0), and has more USB ports (up to four vs. two). This makes the Celeron N4020 a better choice for devices that require reliable and versatile connectivity options.

Price: Atom Z3735F Holds the Edge

When it comes to pricing, the Atom Z3735F has a slight advantage. It can often be found at a lower cost compared to the Celeron N4020. This makes it a more budget-friendly option for those looking for a basic and affordable processor. However, it’s worth noting that the Celeron N4020’s superior performance and features may justify the slightly higher price tag for some users.

The Verdict: Celeron N4020 Wins the Crown

In the battle of Intel Atom Z3735F vs Celeron N4020, the Celeron N4020 emerges as the overall winner. Its superior performance, better graphics capabilities, wider connectivity options, and longer battery life make it the more compelling choice for a wide range of budget-friendly devices. However, if power consumption and cost are your top priorities, the Atom Z3735F remains a solid option.

Beyond the Benchmarks: Real-World Usage Scenarios

To provide a more comprehensive comparison, let’s explore how the Intel Atom Z3735F and Celeron N4020 perform in different real-world usage scenarios:

• Web Browsing and Email: Both processors handle these basic tasks with ease. Web pages load quickly, and emails are sent and received without any noticeable lag.

• Office Productivity: The Celeron N4020’s extra cores and threads provide a noticeable advantage in office applications like Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. Spreadsheets with complex formulas and large presentations with multimedia content load and calculate faster.

• Video Streaming: Both processors can handle video streaming smoothly at resolutions up to 1080p. However, the Celeron N4020’s improved graphics capabilities may provide a slightly better experience, especially with 4K content.

• Light Gaming: The Celeron N4020’s superior graphics performance makes it a better choice for casual gaming. Games like Minecraft, Roblox, and older titles can run smoothly at low to medium graphics settings. However, both processors struggle with demanding AAA titles.

• Battery Life: Laptops and tablets equipped with the Atom Z3735F generally offer longer battery life compared to those powered by the Celeron N4020. This is due to the Atom Z3735F’s lower power consumption.

Information You Need to Know

Q1: Which processor is better for basic tasks like web browsing and email?

A: Both the Intel Atom Z3735F and Celeron N4020 can handle basic tasks adequately. However, the Celeron N4020 may offer slightly faster performance in certain applications due to its additional cores and threads.

Q2: Which processor is better for office productivity tasks like spreadsheets and presentations?

A: The Celeron N4020 is the better choice for office productivity tasks. Its extra cores and threads provide a noticeable performance boost, especially when working with large files or complex calculations.

Q3: Which processor is better for casual gaming?

A: The Celeron N4020 is the better choice for casual gaming. Its improved graphics capabilities allow it to handle older games and less demanding titles at low to medium graphics settings.

Q4: Which processor is better for battery life?

A: The Atom Z3735F is the better choice for battery life. Its lower power consumption allows devices equipped with it to run for longer periods on a single charge.

Q5: Which processor is more affordable?

A: The Atom Z3735F is generally more affordable than the Celeron N4020. However, the Celeron N4020’s superior performance and features may justify the slightly higher price tag for some users.