Intel Atom X5-z8350 Vs Celeron N4020: Which Budget Processor Offers The Best Bang For Your Buck?
What To Know
- Built on the 14nm manufacturing process, the Atom x5-Z8350 features a quad-core architecture with a base clock speed of 1.
- In the battle of budget-friendly processors, the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N4020 each possess their own strengths and weaknesses.
- The Atom x5-Z8350 excels in energy efficiency and multitasking, while the Celeron N4020 delivers better overall performance and graphics capabilities.
In the realm of budget-friendly processors, the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N4020 stand as two prominent contenders. Both processors offer a combination of affordability and decent performance, making them suitable for basic computing tasks. However, discerning the finer differences between these two processors can help you make an informed decision based on your specific needs. This comprehensive comparison delves into the key aspects of the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N4020, providing valuable insights to guide your choice.
Head-to-Head Comparison: Unveiling the Differences
1. Processor Architecture and Manufacturing Process:
- Intel Atom x5-Z8350: Built on the 14nm manufacturing process, the Atom x5-Z8350 features a quad-core architecture with a base clock speed of 1.44GHz and a turbo boost speed of 1.92GHz.
- Celeron N4020: Utilizing the more advanced 10nm manufacturing process, the Celeron N4020 boasts a dual-core architecture with a base clock speed of 1.1GHz and a turbo boost speed of 2.8GHz.
2. Performance and Efficiency:
- Intel Atom x5-Z8350: With its quad-core design, the Atom x5-Z8350 offers improved multitasking capabilities compared to the dual-core Celeron N4020. However, the Celeron N4020 compensates with its higher turbo boost speed, resulting in better performance in single-threaded applications.
- Celeron N4020: Despite its dual-core configuration, the Celeron N4020 delivers better overall performance due to its superior single-threaded performance and higher turbo boost speed. This makes it more suitable for tasks that require fast processing of individual threads.
3. Graphics Processing:
- Intel Atom x5-Z8350: Integrated with Intel HD Graphics, the Atom x5-Z8350 provides basic graphics capabilities suitable for casual gaming and video playback.
- Celeron N4020: Equipped with Intel UHD Graphics 600, the Celeron N4020 offers enhanced graphics performance compared to the Atom x5-Z8350. It can handle more demanding graphics applications and provides smoother video playback.
4. Power Consumption and Thermal Efficiency:
- Intel Atom x5-Z8350: With a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 2W, the Atom x5-Z8350 is highly energy-efficient, making it suitable for fanless devices and laptops that prioritize extended battery life.
- Celeron N4020: Featuring a TDP of 6W, the Celeron N4020 consumes more power than the Atom x5-Z8350. However, it still maintains decent thermal efficiency, allowing for compact and lightweight devices.
5. Supported Memory and Storage:
- Intel Atom x5-Z8350: The Atom x5-Z8350 supports up to 8GB of LPDDR3 memory and eMMC storage.
- Celeron N4020: The Celeron N4020 supports up to 8GB of DDR4 memory and NVMe SSD storage, offering faster data transfer speeds and improved overall system performance.
6. Connectivity and Expansion:
- Intel Atom x5-Z8350: The Atom x5-Z8350 offers limited connectivity options, including Wi-Fi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.0.
- Celeron N4020: The Celeron N4020 provides more comprehensive connectivity options, including Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 5.0, and USB 3.0 ports.
7. Price and Availability:
- Intel Atom x5-Z8350: The Atom x5-Z8350 is generally more affordable than the Celeron N4020.
- Celeron N4020: The Celeron N4020 is typically priced slightly higher than the Atom x5-Z8350 due to its superior performance and features.
Choosing the Right Processor for Your Needs
The choice between the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N4020 ultimately depends on your specific requirements and budget constraints:
- For Basic Computing and Casual Use: If you primarily use your device for basic tasks like web browsing, email, and office applications, either the Atom x5-Z8350 or Celeron N4020 can suffice. However, the Celeron N4020 might be a better option due to its slightly better performance.
- For Multitasking and Productivity: If you frequently multitask and run demanding applications, the quad-core Atom x5-Z8350 offers improved multitasking capabilities.
- For Casual Gaming and Multimedia: If you enjoy casual gaming or video streaming, the Celeron N4020’s superior graphics performance makes it a better choice.
- For Compact and Fanless Devices: The Atom x5-Z8350’s low power consumption and thermal efficiency make it ideal for fanless devices and laptops that prioritize extended battery life.
The Verdict: Finding the Ideal Balance
In the battle of budget-friendly processors, the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N4020 each possess their own strengths and weaknesses. The Atom x5-Z8350 excels in energy efficiency and multitasking, while the Celeron N4020 delivers better overall performance and graphics capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors hinges on your specific needs and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Which processor is better for everyday tasks?
Answer: For basic computing and casual use, both the Atom x5-Z8350 and Celeron N4020 are suitable. However, the Celeron N4020 might be a slightly better choice due to its improved performance.
2. Which processor is better for gaming and multimedia?
Answer: The Celeron N4020’s superior graphics performance makes it a better choice for casual gaming and video streaming.
3. Which processor is more energy-efficient?
Answer: The Atom x5-Z8350 consumes less power and generates less heat, making it more suitable for fanless devices and laptops that prioritize extended battery life.
