Home Troubleshooting For CPU & PC Components
Comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS vs Intel Core i9 10900: Which CPU Reigns Supreme in 2024?

Isaac Lee is the lead tech blogger for Vtech Insider. With over 10 years of experience reviewing consumer electronics and emerging technologies, he is passionate about sharing his knowledge to help readers make informed purchasing decisions.

What To Know

  • The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS features a 6-core, 12-thread configuration, while the Core i9 10900 packs a more powerful 10-core, 20-thread setup.
  • The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS boasts a 28W TDP (Thermal Design Power), while the Core i9 10900 has a higher 65W TDP.
  • To truly understand the performance differences between the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS and the Core i9 10900, we need to look at real-world benchmarks.

Choosing the right CPU for your laptop can be a daunting task, especially with the vast array of options available. Two popular contenders often come up in discussions: the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS and the Intel Core i9 10900. Both processors boast impressive performance, but which one truly reigns supreme?
This comprehensive comparison delves into the key features, performance metrics, and real-world applications of these CPUs, helping you make an informed decision based on your specific needs.

Architecture and Core Count: A Foundation for Performance

The AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS and Intel Core i9 10900 represent different generations of processor technology. The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS is built upon AMD’s Zen 4 architecture, while the Core i9 10900 is based on Intel’s Comet Lake architecture.
The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS features a 6-core, 12-thread configuration, while the Core i9 10900 packs a more powerful 10-core, 20-thread setup. This difference in core count immediately suggests that the Core i9 10900 might have an edge in multi-threaded applications. However, the Zen 4 architecture brings significant performance improvements, potentially bridging the gap in certain scenarios.

Clock Speeds and Boost Frequencies: The Pace of Processing

Clock speed determines how quickly a CPU can process instructions. The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS boasts a base clock speed of 3.8 GHz and a boost clock speed of 5.1 GHz. The Core i9 10900, on the other hand, has a base clock speed of 2.8 GHz and a boost clock speed of 5.3 GHz.
While the Core i9 10900 has a slightly higher boost clock speed, the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS compensates with its significantly higher base clock speed. This difference in clock speeds can influence performance in single-threaded applications.

Cache Memory: A Crucial Buffer for Data

Cache memory acts as a temporary storage space for frequently accessed data, accelerating processing speeds. The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS features 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Core i9 10900 boasts 20 MB of L3 cache. This larger cache size on the Core i9 10900 can potentially contribute to faster data access and improved performance.

Integrated Graphics: A Visual Performance Boost

Both CPUs come with integrated graphics, offering a basic level of visual processing for everyday tasks. The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS integrates AMD Radeon 760M graphics, while the Core i9 10900 features Intel UHD Graphics 630.
While neither CPU is designed for gaming or demanding graphics applications, the AMD Radeon 760M graphics offer slightly better performance compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power Consumption and Thermal Management: Balancing Performance and Efficiency

The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS boasts a 28W TDP (Thermal Design Power), while the Core i9 10900 has a higher 65W TDP. This difference in power consumption indicates that the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS is more energy-efficient, potentially resulting in longer battery life and lower heat generation.

Performance Benchmarks: Putting the CPUs to the Test

To truly understand the performance differences between the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS and the Core i9 10900, we need to look at real-world benchmarks. In general, the Core i9 10900 tends to outperform the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS in multi-threaded tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations.
However, the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS demonstrates competitive performance in single-threaded applications, such as web browsing, productivity tasks, and light gaming. The Zen 4 architecture’s efficiency and optimization play a crucial role in delivering impressive performance despite the lower core count.

Real-World Applications: Choosing the Right CPU for Your Needs

The choice between the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS and the Core i9 10900 ultimately depends on your specific needs and priorities.
For users who prioritize multi-threaded performance: The Core i9 10900 is an excellent choice for demanding tasks like video editing, 3D modeling, and software development. Its higher core count and boost clock speed provide a significant advantage in these scenarios.
For users who prioritize single-threaded performance and energy efficiency: The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS offers a compelling alternative. Its powerful Zen 4 architecture delivers impressive performance in single-threaded applications, while its lower TDP ensures longer battery life and reduced heat generation.
For users on a budget: The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS is often available at a more affordable price point compared to the Core i9 10900. This makes it a great option for budget-conscious users who still desire a powerful and efficient CPU.

The Verdict: A Matter of Priorities

Choosing between the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS and the Intel Core i9 10900 is not a straightforward decision. Both CPUs offer impressive performance and cater to different needs.
The Core i9 10900 excels in multi-threaded workloads, while the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS shines in single-threaded applications and energy efficiency. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific priorities, budget, and the types of tasks you plan to perform.

Basics You Wanted To Know

Q: Which CPU is better for gaming?
A: For gaming, the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS is generally the better choice. While the Core i9 10900 has more cores, the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS’s Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds provide better performance in single-threaded applications, which is crucial for gaming.
Q: Which CPU is more energy-efficient?
A: The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS is significantly more energy-efficient than the Core i9 10900. Its lower TDP and optimized architecture contribute to longer battery life and reduced heat generation.
Q: Which CPU is better for video editing?
A: For video editing, the Core i9 10900 is generally the better choice. Its higher core count and boost clock speed provide a significant advantage in multi-threaded tasks like video rendering and encoding.
Q: Which CPU is better for productivity tasks?
A: Both CPUs are well-suited for productivity tasks. The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS offers slightly better single-threaded performance, while the Core i9 10900 can handle more demanding multitasking scenarios.
Q: Which CPU is better for overall value?
A: The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS offers better overall value for its price. It delivers impressive performance in a wide range of applications, while being more energy-efficient and often more affordable than the Core i9 10900.

Was this page helpful?

Isaac Lee

Isaac Lee is the lead tech blogger for Vtech Insider. With over 10 years of experience reviewing consumer electronics and emerging technologies, he is passionate about sharing his knowledge to help readers make informed purchasing decisions.
Back to top button