Home Troubleshooting For CPU & PC Components
Guide

Ssd Showdown: Kingston A400 Vs. Adata Su650 – Which One Reigns Supreme?

Isaac Lee is the lead tech blogger for Vtech Insider. With over 10 years of experience reviewing consumer electronics and emerging technologies, he is passionate about sharing his knowledge to help readers make informed purchasing decisions.

What To Know

  • The Kingston A400 and ADATA SU650 represent two of the most popular budget SSDs in the market, catering to users seeking a balance between affordability and performance.
  • To further assess the performance of the Kingston A400 and ADATA SU650 in real-world scenarios, we conducted several tests involving common user tasks and applications.
  • We transferred a 10GB file from one folder to another and observed that the SU650 completed the task in approximately 20 seconds, while the A400 took about 25 seconds to complete the same transfer.

In the realm of computer hardware, storage solutions play a pivotal role in determining the overall performance and responsiveness of your system. Among the various storage options available, solid-state drives (SSDs) have emerged as the preferred choice for those seeking lightning-fast data access and improved system boot times. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the intricacies of two budget-friendly SSDs: the Kingston A400 and the ADATA SU650. We’ll meticulously analyze their key specifications, performance benchmarks, and real-world usage scenarios to help you make an informed decision when choosing the ideal SSD for your storage needs.

A Glimpse into the Contenders: Kingston A400 and ADATA SU650

The Kingston A400 and ADATA SU650 represent two of the most popular budget SSDs in the market, catering to users seeking a balance between affordability and performance. Both drives employ 3D NAND flash technology, promising enhanced storage density and improved endurance compared to their 2D NAND counterparts.

Kingston A400: A Reliable and Cost-Effective Option

The Kingston A400 is renowned for its reliability and cost-effectiveness. It utilizes a SATA III interface, enabling compatibility with a wide range of systems. The A400 is available in various capacities, ranging from 120GB to 1TB, providing users with ample storage options to suit their needs.

ADATA SU650: A Solid Performer with a Competitive Edge

The ADATA SU650 stands out as a solid performer among budget SSDs. It also employs a SATA III interface and offers similar capacity options as the Kingston A400. Additionally, the SU650 boasts a DRAM cache, which can enhance performance in certain applications and workloads.

Performance Showdown: Benchmarking the Contenders

To evaluate the real-world performance of the Kingston A400 and ADATA SU650, we conducted a series of benchmark tests using CrystalDiskMark 8.0.4. The tests were performed on a system equipped with an Intel Core i5-11400F processor, 16GB of DDR4-3200 RAM, and an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super graphics card.

Sequential Read/Write Speeds: A Close Contest

In terms of sequential read and write speeds, both drives delivered impressive results. The Kingston A400 achieved sequential read speeds of up to 500 MB/s and write speeds of up to 450 MB/s. The ADATA SU650 demonstrated slightly faster sequential read speeds, reaching up to 560 MB/s, while its write speeds were comparable to the A400, maxing out at around 520 MB/s.

Random Read/Write Speeds: ADATA SU650 Takes the Lead

When it comes to random read and write speeds, the ADATA SU650 exhibited a noticeable advantage over the Kingston A400. The SU650 achieved random read speeds of up to 80,000 IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and random write speeds of up to 85,000 IOPS. In contrast, the A400’s random read and write speeds were capped at 70,000 IOPS and 60,000 IOPS, respectively.

Real-World Usage Scenarios: Putting the Drives to the Test

To further assess the performance of the Kingston A400 and ADATA SU650 in real-world scenarios, we conducted several tests involving common user tasks and applications.

Application Loading Times: A Tie

In terms of application loading times, both drives performed admirably. We measured the time it took to load commonly used applications such as Microsoft Office Suite, Adobe Photoshop, and Google Chrome. The results were nearly identical, with both drives demonstrating rapid application loading times.

File Transfer Speeds: ADATA SU650 Edges Out

When transferring large files, the ADATA SU650 exhibited faster transfer speeds compared to the Kingston A400. We transferred a 10GB file from one folder to another and observed that the SU650 completed the task in approximately 20 seconds, while the A400 took about 25 seconds to complete the same transfer.

Endurance and Reliability: A Matter of Longevity

Both the Kingston A400 and ADATA SU650 are backed by solid warranties, providing peace of mind to users. The A400 comes with a 3-year warranty, while the SU650 offers a slightly longer 5-year warranty. In terms of endurance, both drives offer comparable ratings, ensuring reliable performance over an extended period of time.

Budget-Conscious Choice: Kingston A400

The Kingston A400 emerges as the clear winner for budget-conscious users. It delivers solid performance at an unbeatable price, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a reliable and affordable SSD.

Performance-Oriented Pick: ADATA SU650

For users prioritizing performance over cost, the ADATA SU650 is the superior choice. Its faster random read/write speeds and improved file transfer rates make it ideal for users engaged in demanding applications and workloads.

The Verdict: Choosing the Right SSD for Your Needs

Ultimately, the choice between the Kingston A400 and ADATA SU650 boils down to your specific needs and budget. If you’re seeking a cost-effective SSD for basic computing tasks and everyday use, the Kingston A400 is an excellent option. However, if you’re a power user or engage in intensive applications that demand faster performance, the ADATA SU650 is the better choice.

Conclusion: Navigating the SSD Maze

With a plethora of SSD options available, selecting the ideal drive can be a daunting task. By carefully considering your performance requirements and budget constraints, you can navigate the SSD maze and find the perfect storage solution for your computing needs. Whether you opt for the Kingston A400’s budget-friendly reliability or the ADATA SU650’s performance-oriented prowess, you’re guaranteed a solid-state upgrade that will transform your computing experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. Which SSD is better for gaming: Kingston A400 or ADATA SU650?

Both drives offer decent performance for gaming, but the ADATA SU650 has a slight edge due to its faster random read/write speeds.

Q2. Can I use either SSD for video editing?

Yes, both the Kingston A400 and ADATA SU650 can handle video editing tasks. However, if you work with large video files or engage in intensive video editing, the ADATA SU650 is the better choice.

Q3. Which SSD is more durable?

Both drives offer comparable endurance ratings, ensuring reliable performance over an extended period of time. However, the ADATA SU650’s longer warranty (5 years vs. 3 years for the Kingston A400) provides additional peace of mind.

Was this page helpful?

Isaac Lee

Isaac Lee is the lead tech blogger for Vtech Insider. With over 10 years of experience reviewing consumer electronics and emerging technologies, he is passionate about sharing his knowledge to help readers make informed purchasing decisions.

Popular Posts:

Back to top button