Mediatek Kompanio 500 Vs Intel Celeron N4020: The Battle Of Affordable Performance
What To Know
- When it comes to the Mediatek Kompanio 500 and Intel Celeron N4020, both processors feature four cores and four threads, with a base clock speed of 2.
- However, the Kompanio 500 has an advantage in storage options, supporting both eMMC and NVMe SSDs, while the Celeron N4020 is limited to eMMC storage.
- However, the Kompanio 500 has an advantage in terms of expansion, as it supports both USB Type-C and Thunderbolt 4 ports.
In the realm of budget-friendly laptops and Chromebooks, two prominent processors often take center stage: the Mediatek Kompanio 500 and the Intel Celeron N4020. Both chips cater to users seeking affordable devices without compromising basic computing needs. But how do they stack up against each other? In this in-depth comparison, we’ll delve into the specifications, performance, battery life, and other key aspects of these processors to help you make an informed decision.
Performance Showdown: Mediatek Kompanio 500 vs Intel Celeron N4020
At the heart of any processor lies its performance capabilities. When it comes to the Mediatek Kompanio 500 and Intel Celeron N4020, both processors feature four cores and four threads, with a base clock speed of 2.0GHz and 1.1GHz, respectively. However, the Kompanio 500 has a higher turbo boost speed of 2.6GHz compared to the Celeron N4020’s 2.8GHz.
In terms of benchmarks, the Kompanio 500 generally holds its own against the Celeron N4020 in basic tasks like web browsing, office productivity, and multimedia playback. However, the Celeron N4020 tends to have a slight edge in more demanding applications like video editing and gaming.
Memory and Storage: Striking a Balance
Both the Mediatek Kompanio 500 and Intel Celeron N4020 support up to 8GB of LPDDR4x memory, providing adequate multitasking capabilities for everyday use. However, the Kompanio 500 has an advantage in storage options, supporting both eMMC and NVMe SSDs, while the Celeron N4020 is limited to eMMC storage. NVMe SSDs offer significantly faster read and write speeds compared to eMMC, resulting in improved overall system responsiveness and faster boot times.
Graphics Performance: A Tale of Two GPUs
The Mediatek Kompanio 500 integrates an ARM Mali-G52 MC2 GPU, while the Intel Celeron N4020 utilizes an Intel UHD Graphics 600 GPU. Both GPUs are capable of handling basic graphics tasks like web browsing, video playback, and casual gaming. However, the Mali-G52 MC2 GPU in the Kompanio 500 generally provides better graphics performance, allowing for smoother gameplay and enhanced multimedia experiences.
Battery Life: Endurance on a Budget
When it comes to battery life, the Mediatek Kompanio 500 and Intel Celeron N4020 offer comparable endurance. Both processors are designed to provide all-day battery life on a single charge, making them suitable for users who require long hours of unplugged productivity. However, the actual battery life can vary depending on factors such as screen brightness, usage patterns, and the specific device’s battery capacity.
Connectivity and Expansion: Staying Connected
The Mediatek Kompanio 500 and Intel Celeron N4020 offer a range of connectivity options, including Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.0, and USB ports. However, the Kompanio 500 has an advantage in terms of expansion, as it supports both USB Type-C and Thunderbolt 4 ports. Thunderbolt 4 provides significantly faster data transfer speeds and supports external displays and peripherals, making it a more versatile option for users who need to connect multiple devices.
Price and Availability: Budget-Friendly Contenders
The Mediatek Kompanio 500 and Intel Celeron N4020 are both found in budget-friendly laptops and Chromebooks, typically priced between $200 and $500. The availability of these processors may vary depending on the region and manufacturer.
Final Verdict: Choosing the Right Processor for Your Needs
Ultimately, the choice between the Mediatek Kompanio 500 and Intel Celeron N4020 depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize basic computing tasks, long battery life, and affordability, both processors offer solid options. However, if you’re looking for slightly better graphics performance, faster storage options, and more expansion possibilities, the Mediatek Kompanio 500 may be the better choice.
Quick Answers to Your FAQs
- Q: Which processor is better for gaming, the Mediatek Kompanio 500 or the Intel Celeron N4020?
A: The Mediatek Kompanio 500 generally offers better graphics performance than the Intel Celeron N4020, making it a more suitable choice for casual gaming. However, both processors are not designed for demanding gaming tasks.
- Q: Which processor is more power-efficient, the Mediatek Kompanio 500 or the Intel Celeron N4020?
A: Both processors offer comparable power efficiency, providing all-day battery life on a single charge. The actual battery life may vary depending on usage patterns and device-specific factors.
- Q: Which processor is better for video editing, the Mediatek Kompanio 500 or the Intel Celeron N4020?
A: The Intel Celeron N4020 tends to have a slight edge in video editing performance compared to the Mediatek Kompanio 500. However, both processors are not ideal for intensive video editing tasks.
