Home Troubleshooting For CPU & PC Components
Comparison

Shocking Results: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Intel Core i9 14900 CPU Battle!

Isaac Lee is the lead tech blogger for Vtech Insider. With over 10 years of experience reviewing consumer electronics and emerging technologies, he is passionate about sharing his knowledge to help readers make informed purchasing decisions.

What To Know

  • In the realm of mobile CPUs, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and the Intel Core i9 14900 are two of the most powerful contenders, each boasting impressive specs and features.
  • From the specs alone, it’s clear that the Intel Core i9 14900 boasts a significant advantage in terms of core count and cache size.
  • While the Ryzen 7 7840HS might not match the Intel Core i9 14900 in raw multi-core performance, it still offers a compelling blend of speed and efficiency.

The eternal battle between AMD and Intel continues to rage on, with both companies constantly pushing the boundaries of processor performance. In the realm of mobile CPUs, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and the Intel Core i9 14900 are two of the most powerful contenders, each boasting impressive specs and features. But which one comes out on top? This in-depth comparison explores their key differences, performance benchmarks, and real-world implications to help you make an informed decision.

A Look at the Specs: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Intel Core i9 14900

Before diving into the performance analysis, let’s take a quick look at the core specifications of both CPUs.
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS:

  • Cores: 8
  • Threads: 16
  • Base Clock: 3.8 GHz
  • Boost Clock: 5.1 GHz
  • Cache: 16 MB L3
  • TDP: 35W (up to 54W)
  • Architecture: Zen 4
  • Integrated Graphics: Radeon 780M

Intel Core i9 14900:

  • Cores: 14
  • Threads: 20
  • Base Clock: 2.5 GHz
  • Boost Clock: 5.2 GHz
  • Cache: 25 MB L3
  • TDP: 45W (up to 150W)
  • Architecture: Raptor Lake
  • Integrated Graphics: Intel UHD Graphics 770

From the specs alone, it’s clear that the Intel Core i9 14900 boasts a significant advantage in terms of core count and cache size. However, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS holds its own with a higher boost clock speed and a more efficient architecture.

Performance Benchmarks: Putting the CPUs to the Test

To truly understand the performance difference between these two CPUs, we need to examine real-world benchmark results. Here’s a breakdown of their performance in various categories:
CPU Performance:

  • Cinebench R23: The Intel Core i9 14900 consistently outperforms the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS in multi-core benchmarks like Cinebench R23. This is largely attributed to its higher core count and superior clock speeds.
  • Geekbench 5: Similar to Cinebench, the Intel Core i9 14900 maintains its lead in Geekbench 5, showcasing its prowess in multi-threaded workloads.
  • 7-Zip: In compression and decompression tests, the Intel Core i9 14900 again demonstrates its dominance, thanks to its greater number of cores.

Gaming Performance:

  • 3DMark Time Spy: While the Intel Core i9 14900 edges out the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS in 3DMark Time Spy, the difference is relatively small.
  • Real-World Gaming: In actual gaming scenarios, both CPUs deliver smooth and enjoyable performance, with minimal difference in frame rates.

Power Consumption and Efficiency:

  • Battery Life: The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS shines in terms of power efficiency, offering significantly longer battery life compared to the Intel Core i9 14900.
  • Thermal Performance: The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS generally runs cooler and quieter than the Intel Core i9 14900, thanks to its lower TDP and optimized architecture.

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: The Power of Efficiency

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS excels in power efficiency and thermal performance. Its Zen 4 architecture is designed to deliver exceptional performance while consuming less power. This translates to longer battery life, quieter operation, and less heat generation, making it ideal for thin and light laptops.
While the Ryzen 7 7840HS might not match the Intel Core i9 14900 in raw multi-core performance, it still offers a compelling blend of speed and efficiency. It’s perfect for users who prioritize battery life, quiet operation, and overall system responsiveness.

Intel Core i9 14900: The Multi-Core Beast

The Intel Core i9 14900 is a true multi-core powerhouse, boasting an impressive 14 cores and 20 threads. Its Raptor Lake architecture delivers exceptional performance in demanding tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development. The high core count and impressive boost clock speeds make it a top contender for professionals and power users.
However, its high TDP and thermal output can lead to increased fan noise and potential throttling issues, especially in thin and light laptops. For users who prioritize absolute performance and are willing to sacrifice some battery life and thermal efficiency, the Intel Core i9 14900 is an excellent choice.

Choosing the Right CPU: A Matter of Priorities

The decision between the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and the Intel Core i9 14900 boils down to your individual needs and priorities.
Here’s a quick guide:

  • For users who prioritize battery life, thermal efficiency, and quiet operation: Choose the **AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS**.
  • For users who need the absolute highest performance in multi-core workloads, even at the expense of battery life and thermal efficiency: Choose the **Intel Core i9 14900**.

Ultimately, the best CPU for you depends on your specific usage patterns and the type of tasks you will be performing.

Beyond Performance: Features and Considerations

While performance is a crucial factor, it’s not the only thing to consider when choosing a CPU. Other factors include:

  • Integrated Graphics: The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS comes with the Radeon 780M, which offers decent integrated graphics performance. This is a good option for casual gaming and basic multimedia tasks. The Intel Core i9 14900 features the Intel UHD Graphics 770, which is also capable of handling everyday tasks but might not be suitable for demanding games.
  • Upgradeability: Both CPUs are soldered, meaning you cannot upgrade them in the future. However, the motherboard and other components are still upgradeable, allowing for future customization.
  • Price: The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS is generally more affordable than the Intel Core i9 14900, making it a compelling value proposition.

The Verdict: A Competitive Landscape

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and the Intel Core i9 14900 are both exceptional CPUs that cater to different user needs. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS excels in efficiency, making it ideal for thin and light laptops that prioritize battery life and quiet operation. The Intel Core i9 14900 reigns supreme in multi-core performance, making it a powerhouse for demanding tasks like video editing and 3D rendering.
Ultimately, the best CPU for you depends on your specific requirements and priorities. Carefully consider your workload, budget, and desired features before making your final decision.

Answers to Your Questions

Q: Which CPU is better for gaming?
A: Both CPUs deliver smooth and enjoyable gaming performance. The Intel Core i9 14900 might have a slight edge in certain demanding games, but the difference is often negligible.
Q: Which CPU is better for video editing?
A: The Intel Core i9 14900 is generally better for video editing due to its higher core count and superior multi-core performance. However, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS can still handle video editing tasks efficiently, especially for less demanding projects.
Q: Which CPU has better battery life?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS offers significantly longer battery life compared to the Intel Core i9 14900, thanks to its more efficient architecture and lower TDP.
Q: Which CPU is more affordable?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS is generally more affordable than the Intel Core i9 14900, making it a more budget-friendly option.
Q: Which CPU is better overall?
A: There is no clear “winner” as both CPUs have their strengths and weaknesses. The best CPU for you depends on your specific needs and priorities.

Was this page helpful?

Isaac Lee

Isaac Lee is the lead tech blogger for Vtech Insider. With over 10 years of experience reviewing consumer electronics and emerging technologies, he is passionate about sharing his knowledge to help readers make informed purchasing decisions.
Back to top button