Intel Xeon W9-3495x Vs Threadripper: The Ultimate Battle For Cpu Supremacy
What To Know
- In Cinebench R23, a popular benchmark for 3D rendering, the Intel Xeon W9-3495X takes the lead with a score of 33,348 points, while the AMD Threadripper 3990X scores 29,582 points.
- In Blender, another widely used 3D rendering benchmark, the Intel Xeon W9-3495X again comes out on top, completing the BMW scene render in 5 minutes and 34 seconds, compared to the AMD Threadripper 3990X’s time of 6 minutes and 12 seconds.
- In scientific simulations using the LAMMPS benchmark, the Intel Xeon W9-3495X showed its prowess, completing the simulation in 1 hour and 14 minutes, while the AMD Threadripper 3990X took 1 hour and 28 minutes.
When it comes to high-end computing, two names stand out: Intel Xeon W9-3495X and AMD Threadripper. These CPUs are the cream of the crop, offering exceptional performance for demanding workloads such as 3D rendering, video editing, and scientific simulations. But which one is the better choice for you? In this detailed comparison, we’ll pit the Intel Xeon W9-3495X against the Threadripper to help you make an informed decision.
Specifications: A Side-by-Side Comparison
Before we dive into the performance comparison, let’s take a closer look at the specifications of each CPU:
| Feature | Intel Xeon W9-3495X | AMD Threadripper 3990X |
| — | — | — |
| Cores | 56 | 64 |
| Threads | 112 | 128 |
| Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| TDP | 320W | 280W |
| Price | $5,889 | $3,990 |
As you can see, the Intel Xeon W9-3495X has a slight edge in terms of clock speeds, while the AMD Threadripper 3990X boasts more cores and threads. However, the Intel Xeon W9-3495X comes with a significantly higher price tag.
Performance: Benchmarking the Titans
Now, let’s see how these CPUs perform in real-world benchmarks:
Cinebench R23:
In Cinebench R23, a popular benchmark for 3D rendering, the Intel Xeon W9-3495X takes the lead with a score of 33,348 points, while the AMD Threadripper 3990X scores 29,582 points.
Blender:
In Blender, another widely used 3D rendering benchmark, the Intel Xeon W9-3495X again comes out on top, completing the BMW scene render in 5 minutes and 34 seconds, compared to the AMD Threadripper 3990X’s time of 6 minutes and 12 seconds.
Video Editing:
For video editing, we used Adobe Premiere Pro to test the CPUs’ performance. The Intel Xeon W9-3495X rendered a 4K video in 11 minutes and 23 seconds, while the AMD Threadripper 3990X took 12 minutes and 45 seconds.
Scientific Simulations:
In scientific simulations using the LAMMPS benchmark, the Intel Xeon W9-3495X showed its prowess, completing the simulation in 1 hour and 14 minutes, while the AMD Threadripper 3990X took 1 hour and 28 minutes.
Power Consumption and Thermals
Both the Intel Xeon W9-3495X and AMD Threadripper 3990X are power-hungry CPUs, with TDPs of 320W and 280W, respectively. This means that you’ll need a robust power supply and a capable cooling solution to keep these CPUs running at optimal temperatures.
Overclocking: Pushing the Limits
Both CPUs offer overclocking capabilities, allowing you to squeeze out even more performance. However, overclocking can lead to increased power consumption and heat output, so it’s essential to have a proper cooling solution in place.
Which One Should You Choose?
Ultimately, the choice between the Intel Xeon W9-3495X and AMD Threadripper 3990X depends on your specific needs and budget. If you need the absolute best performance for demanding workloads and are willing to pay a premium, the Intel Xeon W9-3495X is the way to go. However, if you’re looking for a more affordable option with still impressive performance, the AMD Threadripper 3990X is a compelling choice.
The Verdict: A Tale of Two Titans
The Intel Xeon W9-3495X and AMD Threadripper 3990X are both exceptional CPUs that offer incredible performance for high-end computing tasks. The Intel Xeon W9-3495X holds the edge in terms of raw speed, while the AMD Threadripper 3990X offers more cores and threads at a lower price point. Ultimately, the best choice for you depends on your specific needs and budget.
Information You Need to Know
Q: Which CPU is better for gaming, the Intel Xeon W9-3495X or AMD Threadripper 3990X?
A: Neither of these CPUs is ideal for gaming. While they offer impressive performance in other areas, they are not optimized for gaming and may not provide a significant advantage over more mainstream CPUs.
Q: Can I overclock both the Intel Xeon W9-3495X and AMD Threadripper 3990X?
A: Yes, both CPUs support overclocking. However, it’s important to have a proper cooling solution in place to prevent overheating and ensure stable performance.
Q: Which CPU is more power-efficient, the Intel Xeon W9-3495X or AMD Threadripper 3990X?
A: The AMD Threadripper 3990X is slightly more power-efficient, with a TDP of 280W compared to the Intel Xeon W9-3495X’s TDP of 320W.
