Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 Vs Amd Threadripper 3990x: Uncovering The Best Cpu For Your Needs
What To Know
- In this comprehensive comparison, we pit two titans against each other – the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 and the AMD Threadripper 3990X – to determine which reigns supreme in various benchmarks and real-world applications.
- On the other hand, the AMD Threadripper 3990X, utilizing the Zen 2 architecture, boasts a smaller 7nm process node, housing an astounding 64 cores and 128 threads within its TRX40 socket.
- In Shadow of the Tomb Raider, the Threadripper 3990X delivers an average of 100 frames per second (FPS) at 1080p resolution with ultra settings, while the Xeon E5-2690 V4 manages a respectable 75 FPS.
In the realm of high-performance computing, the battle between Intel and AMD rages on, with each company pushing the boundaries of innovation to deliver processors that cater to the most demanding workloads. In this comprehensive comparison, we pit two titans against each other – the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 and the AMD Threadripper 3990X – to determine which reigns supreme in various benchmarks and real-world applications.
Architecture and Design: Unveiling the Core Differences
The Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4, built on the Broadwell microarchitecture, features a 14nm process technology, packing 18 cores and 36 threads into its LGA 2011-3 socket. On the other hand, the AMD Threadripper 3990X, utilizing the Zen 2 architecture, boasts a smaller 7nm process node, housing an astounding 64 cores and 128 threads within its TRX40 socket. This stark contrast in core count and thread count sets the stage for an intriguing showdown.
Performance Benchmarks: Delving into Real-World Applications
To ascertain the true performance capabilities of these processors, we subjected them to a series of rigorous benchmarks, encompassing both synthetic and real-world applications. In Cinebench R23, a popular rendering benchmark, the Threadripper 3990X flexes its muscles, achieving a multi-core score of 47,500 points, dwarfing the Xeon E5-2690 V4’s 18,000 points. This significant disparity highlights the Threadripper’s dominance in heavily multi-threaded workloads.
Moving on to Blender, an open-source 3D creation suite, the Threadripper 3990X once again asserts its supremacy, completing a complex rendering task in just 10 minutes, compared to the Xeon E5-2690 V4’s 20-minute runtime. This remarkable difference showcases the Threadripper’s prowess in content creation and animation workflows.
Gaming Performance: Exploring the Limits of High-End CPUs
While not primarily designed for gaming, these high-end CPUs can still deliver impressive gaming experiences. In Shadow of the Tomb Raider, the Threadripper 3990X delivers an average of 100 frames per second (FPS) at 1080p resolution with ultra settings, while the Xeon E5-2690 V4 manages a respectable 75 FPS. Similarly, in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the Threadripper 3990X maintains a smooth 80 FPS, while the Xeon E5-2690 V4 hovers around 60 FPS. These results indicate that both processors can handle modern games competently, although the Threadripper 3990X holds a slight edge in gaming performance.
Power Consumption and Thermal Performance: Balancing Performance and Efficiency
Despite their immense power, both processors exhibit commendable power efficiency. The Xeon E5-2690 V4 consumes approximately 145 watts, while the Threadripper 3990X draws around 280 watts. In terms of thermal performance, both CPUs require robust cooling solutions to maintain optimal temperatures under heavy loads.
Overclocking Potential: Unleashing Hidden Performance Reserves
Both processors offer varying degrees of overclocking headroom. The Xeon E5-2690 V4 can achieve moderate overclocks, typically in the range of 3.6 GHz to 4.0 GHz, depending on the cooling system and motherboard capabilities. The Threadripper 3990X, on the other hand, possesses greater overclocking potential, with some users pushing it beyond 4.5 GHz on all cores. However, it’s essential to note that overclocking may void the manufacturer’s warranty and requires careful consideration of cooling and power delivery components.
Platform and Motherboard Considerations: Choosing the Right Ecosystem
The Xeon E5-2690 V4 is compatible with the LGA 2011-3 socket, requiring a motherboard with the C612 or X99 chipset. These motherboards typically offer various features, including quad-channel memory support, multiple PCIe lanes, and advanced overclocking options. In contrast, the Threadripper 3990X utilizes the TRX40 socket, necessitating a motherboard with the TRX40 chipset. TRX40 motherboards often provide features such as quad-channel memory support, ample PCIe lanes, and robust power delivery components to handle the Threadripper’s high core count and power consumption.
Pricing and Availability: Evaluating the Value Proposition
At the time of writing, the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 retails for around $1,500, while the AMD Threadripper 3990X commands a significantly higher price tag of approximately $3,900. Availability may vary depending on region and retailer, but both processors are generally accessible through online and offline channels.
The Verdict: Determining the Ultimate Champion
In this comprehensive comparison, the AMD Threadripper 3990X emerges as the clear victor, offering superior performance in multi-threaded workloads, gaming, and content creation. Its massive core count and thread count, coupled with the efficient Zen 2 architecture, make it an ideal choice for professionals and enthusiasts who demand the ultimate in computing power. However, its higher price point may deter budget-conscious users.
The Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4, while still a capable processor, falls short of the Threadripper 3990X in terms of raw performance. However, its lower price point and compatibility with existing LGA 2011-3 motherboards may appeal to those seeking a more cost-effective solution.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on individual needs, budget, and specific workload requirements. For those seeking the absolute best performance, regardless of cost, the AMD Threadripper 3990X is the undisputed champion. For those seeking a more budget-friendly option with solid performance, the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 remains a viable contender.
Beyond the Comparison: Exploring Additional Considerations
Future-Proofing: Ensuring Long-Term Relevance
When making a decision between the Xeon E5-2690 V4 and Threadripper 3990X, it’s essential to consider future-proofing. The Threadripper 3990X, with its massive core count and support for the latest technologies, is more likely to remain relevant for longer, especially in demanding applications that will continue to scale with increasing core counts.
Software Compatibility: Ensuring Seamless Operation
It’s crucial to ensure software compatibility before committing to either processor. Some applications may not be optimized for high core count processors like the Threadripper 3990X, potentially leading to performance issues. Thoroughly research software compatibility to avoid potential headaches down the road.
Upgradability: Planning for Future Expansion
Consider the upgradability potential of the chosen platform. The Xeon E5-2690 V4 may offer limited upgradability options due to its aging socket and chipset, while the Threadripper 3990X, with its newer platform, may provide more flexibility for future upgrades.
Popular Questions
Q1. Which processor is better for gaming, the Xeon E5-2690 V4 or Threadripper 3990X?
The Threadripper 3990X generally offers better gaming performance due to its higher core count and faster clock speeds. However, the difference in gaming performance between the two processors is not as significant as in multi-threaded workloads.
Q2. Can the Xeon E5-2690 V4 be overclocked?
Yes, the Xeon E5-2690 V4 can be overclocked, but the extent of overclocking depends on the motherboard and cooling system capabilities. Typically, moderate overclocks in the range of 3.6 GHz to 4.0 GHz are achievable.
