Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 Vs Amd Threadripper 3990x: A Comparative Deep-dive
What To Know
- The Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 has a TDP of 145 watts, while the AMD Threadripper 3990X has a TDP of 280 watts.
- The Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 is a great choice for users who need a powerful workstation processor at a reasonable price.
- If you’re looking for a powerful workstation processor at a reasonable price, the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 is a great choice.
The Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 and AMD Threadripper 3990X are two of the most powerful workstation processors on the market. Both offer incredible performance for demanding tasks such as video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations. But which one is the right choice for you? In this blog post, we’ll compare the two processors head-to-head and help you decide which one is the best fit for your needs.
The Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 is a Haswell-EP-based processor with 14 cores and 28 threads. It has a base clock speed of 2.6 GHz and a turbo boost speed of 3.5 GHz. The AMD Threadripper 3990X is a Zen 2-based processor with 64 cores and 128 threads. It has a base clock speed of 2.9 GHz and a turbo boost speed of 4.3 GHz.
In terms of core count, the AMD Threadripper 3990X has a clear advantage. It has more than four times as many cores as the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4, which gives it a significant performance boost in heavily multi-threaded applications.
Cache Size
The Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 has 35 MB of L3 cache, while the AMD Threadripper 3990X has 256 MB of L3 cache. This means that the AMD Threadripper 3990X has more than seven times as much L3 cache as the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4. This gives it a significant advantage in applications that require large amounts of data to be stored in cache.
Memory Support
The Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 supports up to 1 TB of DDR4 memory, while the AMD Threadripper 3990X supports up to 2 TB of DDR4 memory. This means that the AMD Threadripper 3990X can handle larger memory workloads than the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4.
PCIe Lanes
The Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 has 40 PCIe lanes, while the AMD Threadripper 3990X has 64 PCIe lanes. This means that the AMD Threadripper 3990X can support more expansion cards than the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4. This is an important consideration if you plan on using multiple graphics cards or other PCIe devices.
Power Consumption
The Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 has a TDP of 145 watts, while the AMD Threadripper 3990X has a TDP of 280 watts. This means that the AMD Threadripper 3990X consumes more power than the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4. This is something to keep in mind if you’re building a workstation that needs to be energy-efficient.
Price
The Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 is priced at around $2,000, while the AMD Threadripper 3990X is priced at around $4,000. This means that the AMD Threadripper 3990X is significantly more expensive than the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4.
Which One Should You Choose?
The Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 is a great choice for users who need a powerful workstation processor at a reasonable price. It offers solid performance for a wide range of applications, and it’s relatively energy-efficient.
The AMD Threadripper 3990X is the best choice for users who need the absolute best performance for demanding tasks such as video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations. It has a massive core count, a large amount of cache, and support for up to 2 TB of memory. However, it’s also significantly more expensive than the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4.
Ultimately, the best processor for you depends on your specific needs and budget. If you’re looking for a powerful workstation processor at a reasonable price, the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 is a great choice. If you need the absolute best performance, the AMD Threadripper 3990X is the way to go.
The Final Verdict: Which Processor Is the Winner?
The AMD Threadripper 3990X is the clear winner in this comparison. It offers significantly better performance than the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 in almost every area. It has a higher core count, more cache, more memory support, and more PCIe lanes. It’s also more power-efficient than the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4.
The only area where the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 has an advantage is price. It’s significantly less expensive than the AMD Threadripper 3990X. However, if you’re looking for the best possible performance, the AMD Threadripper 3990X is the way to go.
Questions You May Have
Q: Which processor is better for gaming, the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 or the AMD Threadripper 3990X?
A: The AMD Threadripper 3990X is better for gaming than the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4. It has a higher core count and more cache, which gives it a significant performance boost in games.
Q: Which processor is better for video editing, the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 or the AMD Threadripper 3990X?
A: The AMD Threadripper 3990X is better for video editing than the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4. It has a higher core count, more cache, and more memory support, which gives it a significant performance boost in video editing applications.
Q: Which processor is better for 3D rendering, the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4 or the AMD Threadripper 3990X?
A: The AMD Threadripper 3990X is better for 3D rendering than the Intel Xeon E5-2690 V4. It has a higher core count, more cache, and more memory support, which gives it a significant performance boost in 3D rendering applications.
