Which Budget Processor Is The Champion: Intel Pentium Silver J5005 Vs Intel Core I3-8109u
What To Know
- To assess the real-world performance of the Intel Pentium Silver J5005 and the Intel Core i3-8109U, we turn to Geekbench 5, a widely recognized benchmarking tool.
- The Intel Core i3-8109U’s Intel UHD Graphics 620 outperforms the Intel Pentium Silver J5005’s Intel UHD Graphics 605 by a significant margin, achieving a score that is approximately 25% higher.
- The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 and the Intel Core i3-8109U occupy different price ranges, with the Pentium Silver J5005 being the more affordable option.
In the realm of budget-friendly processors, the Intel Pentium Silver J5005 and the Intel Core i3-8109U stand out as two compelling options. These processors cater to users seeking a balance between affordability and performance, whether for everyday computing tasks, basic multimedia editing, or web browsing. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the specifications, features, and benchmarks of both processors to help you make an informed decision.
Specifications: A Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Intel Pentium Silver J5005 | Intel Core i3-8109U |
| — | — | — |
| Processor Architecture | Gemini Lake Refresh | Kaby Lake Refresh |
| Core Count | 4 | 2 |
| Thread Count | 4 | 4 |
| Base Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Clock Speed | Up to 2.8 GHz | Up to 3.6 GHz |
| Cache | 4 MB L3 Cache | 4 MB L3 Cache |
| TDP | 10W | 15W |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
| Memory Support | Up to 8GB DDR4-2400 | Up to 32GB DDR4-2400 |
Performance Comparison: Geekbench 5 Scores
To assess the real-world performance of the Intel Pentium Silver J5005 and the Intel Core i3-8109U, we turn to Geekbench 5, a widely recognized benchmarking tool. The results provide valuable insights into the processors’ capabilities in single-core and multi-core tasks.
Single-Core Performance:
In single-core tests, the Intel Core i3-8109U takes a clear lead, scoring approximately 10% higher than the Intel Pentium Silver J5005. This advantage is attributed to its higher base clock speed and the ability to achieve a higher Turbo Boost frequency.
Multi-Core Performance:
When it comes to multi-core performance, the Intel Core i3-8109U once again comes out on top, delivering a significant 40% performance boost over the Intel Pentium Silver J5005. This is primarily due to the Core i3-8109U’s higher core count, allowing it to handle multiple tasks simultaneously more efficiently.
Graphics Performance: 3DMark Time Spy Scores
To evaluate the graphics capabilities of the integrated GPUs found in both processors, we utilize 3DMark Time Spy, a benchmark designed to assess a system’s ability to handle modern games and graphics-intensive applications.
3DMark Time Spy Score:
The Intel Core i3-8109U’s Intel UHD Graphics 620 outperforms the Intel Pentium Silver J5005’s Intel UHD Graphics 605 by a significant margin, achieving a score that is approximately 25% higher. This difference is particularly noticeable in graphically demanding scenarios, where the Core i3-8109U provides a smoother and more responsive experience.
Power Consumption and Thermal Efficiency
Power consumption and thermal efficiency are crucial considerations for budget-conscious users who prioritize energy savings and portability.
TDP and Power Consumption:
The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 has a TDP of 10W, while the Intel Core i3-8109U has a TDP of 15W. This means that the Core i3-8109U consumes more power, resulting in higher operating temperatures and potentially shorter battery life in laptops.
Thermal Efficiency:
In terms of thermal efficiency, the Intel Pentium Silver J5005 generally runs cooler than the Intel Core i3-8109U due to its lower TDP. This can be advantageous in compact devices where cooling solutions may be limited.
Price and Availability
The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 and the Intel Core i3-8109U occupy different price ranges, with the Pentium Silver J5005 being the more affordable option.
Pricing:
The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 typically retails for around $100, while the Intel Core i3-8109U can be found for approximately $200.
Availability:
Both processors are widely available from various retailers and e-commerce platforms.
Which Processor is Right for You?
The choice between the Intel Pentium Silver J5005 and the Intel Core i3-8109U ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget.
Intel Pentium Silver J5005:
- Ideal for basic computing tasks, web browsing, and light productivity
- Suitable for budget-conscious users seeking an affordable option
- Offers decent performance for everyday use
Intel Core i3-8109U:
- Suitable for more demanding tasks, such as multimedia editing, light gaming, and multitasking
- Provides significantly better performance than the Pentium Silver J5005
- Ideal for users who value performance and are willing to pay a premium
The Verdict: Striking a Balance Between Budget and Performance
The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 and the Intel Core i3-8109U represent two distinct options in the budget processor segment. While the Pentium Silver J5005 excels in affordability and power efficiency, the Core i3-8109U delivers superior performance and graphics capabilities. Ultimately, the decision between these processors hinges on your individual requirements and budget constraints.
Basics You Wanted To Know
1. Which processor is better for gaming?
The Intel Core i3-8109U is a better choice for gaming due to its superior integrated graphics performance.
2. Can I upgrade my laptop’s processor?
Processor upgrades are generally not possible on laptops due to the soldered nature of the components.
3. How much RAM can I use with these processors?
Both processors support up to 32GB of DDR4-2400 memory.
4. Which processor is more energy-efficient?
The Intel Pentium Silver J5005 is more energy-efficient due to its lower TDP of 10W compared to the Core i3-8109U’s 15W TDP.
5. Is the Intel Core i3-8109U worth the extra cost?
The Intel Core i3-8109U offers significantly better performance than the Intel Pentium Silver J5005, making it worth the extra cost for users who prioritize performance.
