Face-off: Intel Core I3-1115g4 Vs Intel Celeron N4500: Unveiling The Performance Gap

The realm of budget processors is a fiercely competitive landscape, with Intel and AMD vying for supremacy. In this epic showdown, we pit two contenders against each other: the Intel Core i3-1115G4 and the Intel Celeron N4500. Join us as we delve into their specifications, performance benchmarks, and real-world applications to determine which processor emerges victorious.

At the heart of these processors lies a fundamental difference in their core count and threading capabilities. The Intel Core i3-1115G4 boasts a dual-core, quad-thread configuration, while the Intel Celeron N4500 operates with a dual-core, dual-thread setup. This disparity in threading prowess has a direct impact on multitasking performance, with the Core i3-1115G4 exhibiting superior efficiency in handling multiple tasks simultaneously.

The Battle of Clock Speeds

In the realm of clock speeds, the Intel Core i3-1115G4 holds a commanding lead. Its base clock speed of 3.0GHz and a turbo boost frequency of up to 4.1GHz far outpace the Celeron N4500’s modest 1.1GHz base clock and 2.8GHz turbo boost. This substantial gap in clock speeds translates into noticeably faster processing times for demanding applications and tasks.

Integrated Graphics: A Tale of Two GPUs

When it comes to integrated graphics, the Intel Core i3-1115G4 once again takes the upper hand. It features the Intel UHD Graphics Xe, a significantly more capable GPU than the Intel UHD Graphics 600 found in the Celeron N4500. This graphical advantage empowers the Core i3-1115G4 to handle basic gaming and video editing tasks with greater ease and fluidity.

Performance Benchmarks: Putting Numbers to the Test

To quantify the performance differences between these processors, we turn to a series of benchmark tests. In Cinebench R23, a popular rendering benchmark, the Core i3-1115G4 erzielt a multi-core score of 2,568 points, nearly double the Celeron N4500’s 1,320 points. This stark contrast underscores the Core i3-1115G4’s superior multitasking prowess.

In Geekbench 5, another widely used benchmark suite, the Core i3-1115G4 maintains its dominance. It erzielt a single-core score of 1,249 points and a multi-core score of 2,778 points, while the Celeron N4500 manages a single-core score of 644 points and a multi-core score of 1,348 points. These results further solidify the Core i3-1115G4’s lead in both single-threaded and multi-threaded performance.

Real-World Applications: Where Performance Matters

Moving beyond synthetic benchmarks, let’s explore how these processors fare in real-world applications. For office productivity tasks such as word processing, spreadsheets, and presentations, both the Core i3-1115G4 and the Celeron N4500 provide adequate performance. However, the Core i3-1115G4’s superior multitasking capabilities shine through when working with multiple applications simultaneously.

In web browsing, the Core i3-1115G4’s faster clock speeds and more capable GPU result in smoother scrolling, quicker page loading times, and an overall more responsive browsing experience. The Celeron N4500, while capable of handling basic web browsing, may struggle with more demanding websites or multiple tabs open simultaneously.

The Verdict: A Clear Winner Emerges

After careful analysis of specifications, performance benchmarks, and real-world applications, the Intel Core i3-1115G4 emerges as the clear victor in this head-to-head comparison. Its superior core count, clock speeds, integrated graphics, and overall performance make it the ideal choice for users seeking a budget processor that can handle a wide range of tasks, from basic office work to light gaming and video editing.

Beyond the Comparison: Additional Insights

While the Core i3-1115G4 stands out as the superior processor, there are a few additional points to consider:

• Power Consumption: The Celeron N4500 has a lower TDP (thermal design power) of 6 watts compared to the Core i3-1115G4’s 15 watts. This makes the Celeron N4500 more energy-efficient and suitable for devices with limited battery life.

• Price: The Celeron N4500 is typically more affordable than the Core i3-1115G4. Budget-conscious users may find the Celeron N4500 a more attractive option, especially if their primary focus is on basic tasks and low power consumption.

Q&A

1. Which processor is better for gaming?

The Intel Core i3-1115G4 is the better choice for gaming due to its more capable integrated graphics, the Intel UHD Graphics Xe. It can handle basic gaming and older titles at playable frame rates, while the Celeron N4500’s Intel UHD Graphics 600 is not suitable for gaming.

2. Which processor is better for video editing?

The Intel Core i3-1115G4 is also the better choice for video editing. Its faster clock speeds and more powerful integrated graphics allow it to handle video editing tasks more smoothly and efficiently. The Celeron N4500 may struggle with video editing, especially when working with high-resolution footage or complex effects.

3. Which processor is better for multitasking?

The Intel Core i3-1115G4 is the superior choice for multitasking due to its quad-thread configuration. It can handle multiple applications and tasks simultaneously without experiencing significant slowdowns. The Celeron N4500’s dual-thread design limits its multitasking capabilities, making it less suitable for users who frequently work with multiple programs or tabs open.