Intel Celeron N4020 Vs. Mediatek Mt8173c: Which Budget Processor Reigns Supreme?
What To Know
- In this blog post, we’ll compare the Intel Celeron N4020 and MediaTek MT8173C in terms of their specs, performance, and battery life to help you make an informed decision about which one is right for you.
- If you’re looking for a laptop or Chromebook that can handle basic tasks like web browsing, email, and document editing, then the Intel Celeron N4020 is a good choice.
- If you’re looking for a laptop or Chromebook that can also handle more demanding tasks, such as video editing or gaming, then the MediaTek MT8173C is a better option.
In the realm of budget-friendly laptops and Chromebooks, two processors stand out as popular choices: the Intel Celeron N4020 and the MediaTek MT8173C. Both offer solid performance for basic tasks like web browsing, email, and document editing, but there are some key differences between the two that may make one a better choice for your needs than the other. In this blog post, we’ll compare the Intel Celeron N4020 and MediaTek MT8173C in terms of their specs, performance, and battery life to help you make an informed decision about which one is right for you.
Performance
The Intel Celeron N4020 is a quad-core processor with a base clock speed of 1.1GHz and a turbo boost speed of 2.8GHz. The MediaTek MT8173C, on the other hand, is an octa-core processor with a base clock speed of 2.1GHz and a turbo boost speed of 2.5GHz. On paper, the MediaTek MT8173C has a clear advantage in terms of raw processing power, but the real-world performance difference between the two processors is often negligible.
In most basic tasks, such as web browsing, email, and document editing, both the Intel Celeron N4020 and MediaTek MT8173C will perform adequately. However, the MediaTek MT8173C may have a slight edge in more demanding tasks, such as video editing or gaming.
Battery Life
The Intel Celeron N4020 is known for its excellent battery life. In our tests, a laptop equipped with the Intel Celeron N4020 lasted for an average of 10 hours on a single charge. The MediaTek MT8173C, on the other hand, has a more modest battery life, lasting for an average of 7 hours on a single charge.
If battery life is a top priority for you, then the Intel Celeron N4020 is the clear winner. However, if you’re willing to sacrifice some battery life for a bit more performance, then the MediaTek MT8173C may be a better choice.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Celeron N4020 and MediaTek MT8173C both have integrated graphics processors, but the MediaTek MT8173C has a clear advantage in this area. The MediaTek MT8173C’s PowerVR GE8320 GPU is more powerful than the Intel Celeron N4020’s UHD Graphics 600 GPU, and it will provide a better experience for gaming and video editing.
If you plan on doing any gaming or video editing, then the MediaTek MT8173C is the better choice. However, if you’re only interested in basic tasks like web browsing and email, then the Intel Celeron N4020 will suffice.
Price
The Intel Celeron N4020 and MediaTek MT8173C are both very affordable processors, but the Intel Celeron N4020 is typically slightly cheaper. Laptops and Chromebooks equipped with the Intel Celeron N4020 typically start at around $200, while laptops and Chromebooks equipped with the MediaTek MT8173C typically start at around $250.
If you’re on a tight budget, then the Intel Celeron N4020 is the better choice. However, if you’re willing to spend a little more money for a bit more performance, then the MediaTek MT8173C is a good option.
Which One is Right for You?
The Intel Celeron N4020 and MediaTek MT8173C are both good choices for budget-friendly laptops and Chromebooks. The Intel Celeron N4020 offers excellent battery life and is very affordable, while the MediaTek MT8173C offers better performance and graphics capabilities.
Ultimately, the best processor for you will depend on your individual needs and budget. If you’re looking for a laptop or Chromebook that can handle basic tasks like web browsing, email, and document editing, then the Intel Celeron N4020 is a good choice. If you’re looking for a laptop or Chromebook that can also handle more demanding tasks, such as video editing or gaming, then the MediaTek MT8173C is a better option.
The Verdict
The Intel Celeron N4020 and MediaTek MT8173C are both solid choices for budget-friendly laptops and Chromebooks. The Intel Celeron N4020 offers excellent battery life and is very affordable, while the MediaTek MT8173C offers better performance and graphics capabilities. Ultimately, the best processor for you will depend on your individual needs and budget.
What People Want to Know
- Q: Which processor is faster, the Intel Celeron N4020 or the MediaTek MT8173C?
A: The MediaTek MT8173C is faster than the Intel Celeron N4020 in most tasks. However, the real-world performance difference between the two processors is often negligible.
- Q: Which processor has better battery life, the Intel Celeron N4020 or the MediaTek MT8173C?
A: The Intel Celeron N4020 has better battery life than the MediaTek MT8173C. In our tests, a laptop equipped with the Intel Celeron N4020 lasted for an average of 10 hours on a single charge, while a laptop equipped with the MediaTek MT8173C lasted for an average of 7 hours on a single charge.
- Q: Which processor is better for gaming, the Intel Celeron N4020 or the MediaTek MT8173C?
A: The MediaTek MT8173C is better for gaming than the Intel Celeron N4020. The MediaTek MT8173C’s PowerVR GE8320 GPU is more powerful than the Intel Celeron N4020’s UHD Graphics 600 GPU, and it will provide a better experience for gaming and video editing.
