Intel Celeron N4020 Vs Apple M1: Which Budget Processor Reigns Supreme?
What To Know
- When it comes to graphics performance, the Apple M1’s integrated GPU outperforms the Intel UHD Graphics 600 found in the Celeron N4020.
- The Apple M1, on the other hand, is a more premium processor found in Apple’s MacBooks and iMacs.
- The Apple M1’s superior graphics performance makes it a better choice for casual gaming compared to the Intel Celeron N4020.
In the realm of computing, choosing the right processor is crucial for ensuring optimal performance and efficiency. When it comes to budget-friendly options, the Intel Celeron N4020 and Apple M1 stand out as compelling choices. This comprehensive comparison delves into the key differences between these two processors, helping you make an informed decision based on your specific needs and preferences.
| Feature | Intel Celeron N4020 | Apple M1 |
| — | — | — |
| CPU Architecture | x86-64 | ARM64 |
| Cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base Clock Speed | 1.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Cache | 4MB L3 | 8MB L2 + 128MB L3 |
| TDP | 6W | 10W |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Apple M1 Integrated GPU |
| Memory Support | DDR4-2400 | LPDDR4X-4266 |
| Manufacturing Process | 14nm | 5nm |
Performance Comparison
The Apple M1 boasts a significant performance advantage over the Intel Celeron N4020 in various benchmarks. This is primarily due to its superior architecture, higher core count, and more efficient manufacturing process. The M1’s 8 cores, combined with its powerful integrated GPU, deliver exceptional performance for everyday tasks, content creation, and even light gaming. In contrast, the Celeron N4020 struggles with demanding applications and multitasking, often resulting in noticeable lag and slowdowns.
Power Efficiency
The Intel Celeron N4020 and Apple M1 exhibit contrasting power consumption profiles. The Celeron N4020’s 6W TDP makes it suitable for fanless designs, resulting in silent operation. However, this comes at the cost of performance. On the other hand, the M1’s 10W TDP allows it to strike a balance between performance and power efficiency. The M1’s superior architecture and optimized power management enable it to deliver impressive performance while maintaining reasonable power consumption.
Graphics Performance
When it comes to graphics performance, the Apple M1’s integrated GPU outperforms the Intel UHD Graphics 600 found in the Celeron N4020. The M1’s GPU features 8 cores and supports Metal, Apple’s graphics API, which provides optimized performance for macOS and iOS applications. This makes the M1 a more capable choice for casual gaming, video editing, and other graphics-intensive tasks.
Compatibility and Software Support
The Intel Celeron N4020 is compatible with a wide range of Windows-based laptops and Chromebooks. This makes it a versatile option for users who prefer the familiarity of Windows or the simplicity of Chrome OS. In contrast, the Apple M1 is exclusively found in Apple’s MacBooks and iMacs, limiting its compatibility to macOS. However, macOS offers a seamless user experience, tight integration with Apple’s ecosystem, and access to a vast library of optimized applications.
Price and Availability
The Intel Celeron N4020 is a budget-friendly processor typically found in affordable laptops and Chromebooks. Its price ranges from $100 to $150. The Apple M1, on the other hand, is a more premium processor found in Apple’s MacBooks and iMacs. Its price starts at $699 for the MacBook Air and goes up to $1,299 for the MacBook Pro.
Verdict: Choosing the Right Processor for Your Needs
Ultimately, the choice between the Intel Celeron N4020 and Apple M1 depends on your specific requirements and budget. If you prioritize affordability, basic computing tasks, and fanless operation, the Celeron N4020 is a solid choice. However, if you demand exceptional performance, graphics capabilities, and a seamless user experience, the Apple M1 is the superior option, despite its higher price tag.
Beyond the Comparison: Additional Considerations
1. Operating System: Consider your preferred operating system. The Celeron N4020 supports Windows and Chrome OS, while the M1 is exclusive to macOS.
2. Portability: If portability is a priority, the M1-powered MacBooks offer slim and lightweight designs, making them ideal for mobile users.
3. Software Ecosystem: The M1 benefits from Apple’s tightly integrated ecosystem, including optimized apps and seamless connectivity with other Apple devices.
4. Future-Proofing: The M1’s superior performance and energy efficiency make it a more future-proof investment compared to the Celeron N4020.
What You Need to Learn
Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: The Apple M1’s superior graphics performance makes it a better choice for casual gaming compared to the Intel Celeron N4020.
Q: Can I upgrade the processor in my laptop?
A: Processor upgrades are typically not possible in laptops due to the soldered nature of the components.
Q: Which processor is better for video editing?
A: The Apple M1’s powerful GPU and optimized software ecosystem make it a better choice for video editing compared to the Intel Celeron N4020.
Q: Which processor is better for programming?
A: Both processors can handle basic programming tasks, but the M1’s superior performance and optimized software tools may provide a better experience for demanding programming workloads.
Q: Which processor is better for battery life?
A: The Apple M1’s efficient architecture and optimized power management result in superior battery life compared to the Intel Celeron N4020.
