Intel Celeron N3350 Vs Atom X5-z8350: Which Budget Processor Reigns Supreme?

In the realm of budget-friendly processors, two contenders stand out: the Intel Celeron N3350 and the Atom x5-Z8350. These processors are commonly found in entry-level laptops, tablets, and mini PCs, offering users basic computing capabilities at an affordable price. In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the specifications, performance, and features of these two processors to help you make an informed decision about which one best suits your needs.

Head-to-Head Specifications

Before diving into the performance comparison, let’s take a closer look at the technical specifications of the Intel Celeron N3350 and Atom x5-Z8350.

Performance Comparison

Now that we’ve examined the specifications, let’s see how the Intel Celeron N3350 and Atom x5-Z8350 perform in various benchmarks and real-world scenarios.

Single-Core Performance

In single-core performance, the Intel Celeron N3350 has a slight edge over the Atom x5-Z8350. This is due to its higher base clock speed and Turbo Boost frequency. This advantage is particularly noticeable in tasks that rely heavily on single-threaded performance, such as web browsing, office productivity, and basic photo editing.

Multi-Core Performance

When it comes to multi-core performance, the Atom x5-Z8350 takes the lead thanks to its quad-core design. This advantage is evident in applications that can take advantage of multiple cores, such as video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking. However, it’s important to note that the performance gap between the two processors is not significant, and most users won’t notice a noticeable difference in everyday tasks.

Integrated Graphics Performance

Both the Intel Celeron N3350 and Atom x5-Z8350 feature integrated graphics, but there’s a noticeable difference in their performance. The Intel HD Graphics 500 in the Celeron N3350 is more powerful than the Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) in the Atom x5-Z8350. This means that the Celeron N3350 can handle basic gaming and video playback more smoothly.

Power Consumption and Battery Life

The Atom x5-Z8350 has a clear advantage in terms of power consumption and battery life. With a TDP of just 2 Watts, it’s significantly more energy-efficient than the Celeron N3350, which has a TDP of 6 Watts. This makes the Atom x5-Z8350 a better choice for devices that prioritize long battery life, such as tablets and convertibles.

Features and Connectivity

Both the Intel Celeron N3350 and Atom x5-Z8350 offer a range of features and connectivity options. These include support for DDR3L memory, SATA storage, and various I/O ports. However, there are some differences worth noting.

The Celeron N3350 supports faster memory speeds (up to 1866 MHz) compared to the Atom x5-Z8350 (up to 1600 MHz). Additionally, the Celeron N3350 has more PCI Express lanes, allowing for better expandability.

Which Processor is Right for You?

The choice between the Intel Celeron N3350 and Atom x5-Z8350 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize single-core performance, integrated graphics performance, and expandability, the Celeron N3350 is a better choice. However, if you value multi-core performance, power efficiency, and long battery life, the Atom x5-Z8350 is the way to go.

Beyond the Benchmarks: Real-World Usage Scenarios

To provide a more comprehensive understanding of how the Intel Celeron N3350 and Atom x5-Z8350 perform in real-world scenarios, let’s explore some specific use cases:

Web Browsing and Office Productivity

Both processors can handle basic web browsing, email, and office productivity tasks without any issues. However, the Celeron N3350 may offer a slightly smoother experience in more demanding web applications or while multitasking.

Multimedia Consumption

Both processors can handle basic video playback and music streaming. However, the Celeron N3350’s more powerful integrated graphics make it a better choice for casual gaming and video editing.

Multitasking

The Atom x5-Z8350’s quad-core design gives it an edge in multitasking scenarios. It can handle multiple applications running simultaneously more smoothly than the Celeron N3350.

Battery Life

The Atom x5-Z8350’s superior power efficiency translates to longer battery life. Devices powered by the Atom x5-Z8350 can typically last several hours longer on a single charge than those powered by the Celeron N3350.

“Wrap-Up: Making an Informed Decision”

The Intel Celeron N3350 and Atom x5-Z8350 are both capable budget-friendly processors that offer basic computing capabilities. The Celeron N3350 excels in single-core performance, integrated graphics performance, and expandability, while the Atom x5-Z8350 shines in multi-core performance, power efficiency, and battery life. Ultimately, the best choice for you depends on your specific needs and preferences. Consider the factors discussed in this comparison to make an informed decision that aligns with your computing requirements.

Top Questions Asked

Q: Which processor is better for gaming?

A: The Intel Celeron N3350 has a more powerful integrated graphics unit, making it a better choice for casual gaming.

Q: Which processor is more suitable for students?

A: Both processors can handle basic student tasks, but the Atom x5-Z8350’s longer battery life may be an advantage for students on the go.

Q: Can these processors handle video editing?

A: While both processors can handle basic video editing, the Celeron N3350’s stronger integrated graphics make it a better choice for more demanding video editing tasks.

Q: Which processor is better for multitasking?

A: The Atom x5-Z8350’s quad-core design gives it an edge in multitasking scenarios, allowing it to handle multiple applications running simultaneously more smoothly.

Q: Which processor is more energy-efficient?

A: The Atom x5-Z8350 has a lower TDP and consumes less power, making it more energy-efficient than the Celeron N3350.