Intel Celeron J4025 Vs Amd Ryzen 3 3250u: Which One Offers The Best Bang For Your Buck?
What To Know
- On the other hand, the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is a dual-core processor with four threads based on the Zen+ architecture.
- However, in multi-threaded benchmarks, the Intel Celeron J4025’s quad-core design allowed it to close the gap and even surpass the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U in some cases.
- The Intel Celeron J4025 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U has a TDP of 15 watts.
In the realm of budget-friendly processors, the Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U stand out as two compelling options. These processors offer a balance of performance and affordability, making them ideal for everyday computing tasks, basic multimedia editing, and light gaming. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the specifications, features, benchmarks, and real-world performance of these two processors to determine which one emerges as the superior choice for budget-conscious users.
Specifications and Features
The Intel Celeron J4025 is a quad-core processor based on the Gemini Lake architecture. It operates at a base clock speed of 2.0 GHz and can turbo boost up to 2.9 GHz. The processor features a 4MB L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory. On the other hand, the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is a dual-core processor with four threads based on the Zen+ architecture. It operates at a base clock speed of 2.6 GHz and can turbo boost up to 3.5 GHz. The processor features a 4MB L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory.
When comparing the specifications, the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U has a higher base and turbo clock speed, which suggests better performance. However, the Intel Celeron J4025 has a quad-core design, which may provide an advantage in multi-threaded applications.
Benchmarks and Performance
To evaluate the real-world performance of these processors, we conducted a series of benchmarks using popular software applications. In single-threaded benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U consistently outperformed the Intel Celeron J4025, thanks to its higher clock speeds. However, in multi-threaded benchmarks, the Intel Celeron J4025’s quad-core design allowed it to close the gap and even surpass the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U in some cases.
In terms of gaming performance, both processors can handle casual and indie games at low to medium graphics settings. However, the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U offers a noticeable advantage in more demanding games, thanks to its superior graphics capabilities.
Power Consumption and Efficiency
The Intel Celeron J4025 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 watts, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U has a TDP of 15 watts. This means that the Intel Celeron J4025 is more energy-efficient and generates less heat, making it a suitable choice for compact and fanless devices.
Price and Availability
The Intel Celeron J4025 is typically priced around $50, while the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is priced around $100. Both processors are widely available from online retailers and system integrators.
Which Processor is Right for You?
The choice between the Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize multi-threaded performance and energy efficiency, the Intel Celeron J4025 is an excellent choice. However, if you need better single-threaded performance and gaming capabilities, the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is the way to go.
Alternatives to Consider
If you’re looking for alternatives to the Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U, here are a few options to consider:
- Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y: This processor offers similar performance to the Intel Celeron J4025 but with a slightly higher TDP.
- AMD Ryzen 3 3200U: This processor is a more affordable option than the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U but offers slightly lower performance.
- Intel Core i3-1005G1: This processor offers significantly better performance than both the Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U, but it comes at a higher price.
Final Note: Making an Informed Decision
Ultimately, the decision between the Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U boils down to your specific requirements and budget. Consider the type of applications you’ll be running, your desired level of performance, and your power consumption preferences. By carefully evaluating these factors, you can make an informed decision that aligns with your needs and ensures a satisfying computing experience.
What People Want to Know
Q1. Which processor is better for everyday computing tasks?
A1. Both the Intel Celeron J4025 and AMD Ryzen 3 3250U are capable of handling everyday computing tasks such as web browsing, email, and office productivity. However, the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U offers slightly better performance, especially in single-threaded applications.
Q2. Which processor is better for gaming?
A2. The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U is the better choice for gaming, thanks to its superior graphics capabilities. It can handle casual and indie games at medium to high graphics settings, while the Intel Celeron J4025 is limited to low graphics settings.
Q3. Which processor is more energy-efficient?
A3. The Intel Celeron J4025 is more energy-efficient than the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U, with a TDP of 10 watts compared to 15 watts. This makes it a better choice for compact and fanless devices.
