Which Budget Processor Reigns Supreme? Intel Atom Z3735f Vs Celeron N4000 Performance Showdown
What To Know
- In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the key differences between the Atom Z3735F and the Celeron N4000, helping you make an informed decision about which processor is right for your needs.
- However, the Celeron N4000 has a more comprehensive set of expansion options, including support for eMMC and NVMe storage, as well as the ability to connect to external displays via HDMI or DisplayPort.
- In addition to the technical specifications, there are a few other factors to keep in mind when choosing between the Atom Z3735F and the Celeron N4000.
When it comes to budget-friendly processors, the Intel Atom Z3735F and the Celeron N4000 stand out as two of the most popular options. Both processors offer solid performance for basic tasks, making them ideal for everyday use. But which one is the better choice? In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the key differences between the Atom Z3735F and the Celeron N4000, helping you make an informed decision about which processor is right for your needs.
1. Architecture and Core Count
The Intel Atom Z3735F is based on the Silvermont architecture, featuring four cores and four threads. On the other hand, the Celeron N4000 utilizes the Gemini Lake architecture, boasting four cores and four threads as well. While both processors have the same core count, the Celeron N4000 benefits from a more modern architecture, potentially resulting in improved performance and efficiency.
2. Clock Speed and Turbo Boost
The Atom Z3735F operates at a base clock speed of 1.33 GHz and can reach a maximum turbo boost speed of 1.83 GHz. In comparison, the Celeron N4000 has a higher base clock speed of 1.1 GHz but can achieve a slightly faster turbo boost speed of 2.6 GHz. The higher turbo boost speed of the Celeron N4000 may provide a performance advantage in certain applications that can utilize the extra boost.
3. Integrated Graphics
Both the Atom Z3735F and the Celeron N4000 integrate Intel HD Graphics. However, the Celeron N4000 features the newer Intel UHD Graphics 600, which offers improved performance and support for 4K video playback. This makes the Celeron N4000 a better choice for users who plan on using their device for media consumption or light gaming.
4. Power Consumption and Thermal Design Power (TDP)
The Intel Atom Z3735F has a TDP of 2.2 watts, while the Celeron N4000 has a TDP of 6 watts. This means that the Atom Z3735F is more power-efficient and generates less heat, making it suitable for devices with limited cooling capabilities. The lower TDP of the Atom Z3735F also contributes to longer battery life in laptops and tablets.
5. Memory Support
The Atom Z3735F supports up to 2 GB of LPDDR3 memory, while the Celeron N4000 supports up to 8 GB of LPDDR4 memory. The increased memory support of the Celeron N4000 allows for smoother multitasking and improved performance in memory-intensive applications.
6. Connectivity and Expansion Options
The Atom Z3735F and the Celeron N4000 both offer a range of connectivity options, including Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and USB ports. However, the Celeron N4000 has a more comprehensive set of expansion options, including support for eMMC and NVMe storage, as well as the ability to connect to external displays via HDMI or DisplayPort.
7. Price and Availability
The Intel Atom Z3735F and the Celeron N4000 are both budget-friendly processors, with the Atom Z3735F typically being slightly more affordable. The availability of these processors may vary depending on the region and the specific device manufacturer.
Making the Right Choice: Which Processor Should You Choose?
When choosing between the Intel Atom Z3735F and the Celeron N4000, consider your specific needs and usage patterns. If you’re looking for a highly power-efficient processor for basic tasks and long battery life, the Atom Z3735F is a great option. However, if you need improved performance for media consumption, light gaming, or multitasking, the Celeron N4000 is the better choice.
Beyond the Comparison: Additional Factors to Consider
In addition to the technical specifications, there are a few other factors to keep in mind when choosing between the Atom Z3735F and the Celeron N4000:
- Device Form Factor: Consider the form factor of the device you’re planning to use. The Atom Z3735F is often found in tablets and low-power laptops, while the Celeron N4000 is more common in laptops and mini PCs.
- Operating System: Make sure the processor you choose is compatible with the operating system you intend to use. Both processors support Windows 10 and various Linux distributions.
- Brand Reputation and Support: Consider the reputation and support offered by the respective brands. Intel is a well-established brand with a strong track record of providing reliable products and customer support.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which processor is better for gaming, the Atom Z3735F or the Celeron N4000?
A: The Celeron N4000 is generally better for gaming due to its higher clock speed, improved integrated graphics, and support for faster memory.
Q: Can either of these processors handle video editing or graphic design work?
A: While both processors can handle basic video editing and graphic design tasks, they may struggle with more demanding workloads. For intensive creative applications, a more powerful processor is recommended.
Q: Which processor is more suitable for everyday use, such as web browsing, email, and office productivity?
A: Both the Atom Z3735F and the Celeron N4000 are suitable for everyday use. However, the Celeron N4000 may provide a slightly smoother and more responsive experience, especially when multitasking or running multiple applications simultaneously.
