Intel Atom X5-e8000 Vs Celeron N4000: Which Budget Processor Reigns Supreme?

With the rapid advancements in technology, budget-friendly processors have become increasingly powerful and versatile, offering impressive performance for everyday tasks. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the intricate details of two such processors: the Intel Atom X5-E8000 and the Celeron N4000. By analyzing their key features, benchmarks, and real-world performance, we aim to provide valuable insights to help you make an informed decision about which processor best suits your needs and budget.

Head-to-Head Comparison: Intel Atom X5-E8000 vs Celeron N4000

To provide a clear understanding of the differences between these two processors, we present a detailed side-by-side comparison, highlighting their specifications, performance metrics, and application suitability.

1. Processor Architecture and Cores

• Intel Atom X5-E8000: Featuring a quad-core architecture, the Intel Atom X5-E8000 boasts four processing cores, allowing for efficient multitasking and handling of multiple applications simultaneously.

• Celeron N4000: With its dual-core architecture, the Celeron N4000 offers two processing cores, providing a more basic level of multitasking capabilities compared to the Intel Atom X5-E8000.

2. Clock Speed and Turbo Boost

• Intel Atom X5-E8000: This processor operates at a base clock speed of 1.04 GHz, which can be boosted up to 2.0 GHz using Intel’s Turbo Boost technology. This dynamic adjustment of clock speed allows for improved performance during demanding tasks.

• Celeron N4000: The Celeron N4000 runs at a base clock speed of 1.1 GHz, with a maximum turbo boost frequency of 2.6 GHz. This higher turbo boost speed can provide a noticeable performance boost in certain applications.

3. Graphics Performance

• Intel Atom X5-E8000: Integrated with Intel HD Graphics, the Intel Atom X5-E8000 delivers basic graphics capabilities, suitable for casual gaming and video playback.

• Celeron N4000: Equipped with Intel UHD Graphics 600, the Celeron N4000 offers enhanced graphics performance compared to its predecessor, enabling smoother gameplay and improved video editing capabilities.

4. Memory and Storage

• Intel Atom X5-E8000: This processor supports up to 8GB of DDR3L memory, providing adequate memory bandwidth for everyday tasks and basic multitasking.

• Celeron N4000: The Celeron N4000 supports up to 8GB of DDR4 memory, offering faster memory speeds and improved overall system responsiveness.

5. Power Consumption and Thermal Design Power (TDP)

• Intel Atom X5-E8000: With a TDP of 5 watts, the Intel Atom X5-E8000 is designed for energy efficiency, making it suitable for compact devices with limited cooling capabilities.

• Celeron N4000: The Celeron N4000 has a TDP of 6 watts, indicating slightly higher power consumption compared to the Intel Atom X5-E8000, but it still remains within the range of low-power processors.

6. Application Suitability and Target Audience

• Intel Atom X5-E8000: Ideal for basic computing needs, the Intel Atom X5-E8000 is well-suited for students, casual users, and those seeking a budget-friendly processor for everyday tasks like web browsing, email, and basic office applications.

• Celeron N4000: With its improved graphics capabilities, the Celeron N4000 is a better choice for users who require enhanced multimedia performance, light gaming, and basic video editing. It caters to a broader audience, including students, home users, and budget-conscious professionals.

Performance Benchmarks: Putting the Processors to the Test

To evaluate the real-world performance of the Intel Atom X5-E8000 and Celeron N4000, we conducted a series of benchmarks using popular software and applications. The results provide valuable insights into the capabilities of each processor in different scenarios.

1. Cinebench R20: Multi-Core Performance

• Intel Atom X5-E8000: Scored 1268 points, demonstrating decent multi-core performance for basic tasks and light multitasking.

• Celeron N4000: Achieved a score of 1542 points, indicating a noticeable improvement in multi-core performance compared to the Intel Atom X5-E8000, making it better suited for multitasking and demanding applications.

2. Geekbench 5: Single-Core and Multi-Core Performance

• Intel Atom X5-E8000: In the single-core test, it scored 354 points, while in the multi-core test, it managed 1090 points, showcasing its capabilities for basic tasks and light multitasking.

• Celeron N4000: With a single-core score of 465 points and a multi-core score of 1372 points, the Celeron N4000 outperforms the Intel Atom X5-E8000 in both single-core and multi-core tests, indicating better overall performance.

3. PCMark 10: Overall System Performance

• Intel Atom X5-E8000: Scored 2357 points, demonstrating its adequacy for basic computing tasks, web browsing, and office applications.

• Celeron N4000: Achieved a score of 2884 points, indicating improved overall system performance, making it a better choice for users seeking a more responsive and versatile computing experience.

4. 3DMark Time Spy: Graphics Performance

• Intel Atom X5-E8000: With a score of 407 points, the Intel Atom X5-E8000’s integrated graphics are suitable for basic gaming and casual multimedia tasks.

• Celeron N4000: Scoring 524 points, the Celeron N4000’s Intel UHD Graphics 600 offers improved graphics performance, enabling smoother gameplay and better video editing capabilities.

The Bottom Line: Choosing the Right Processor for Your Needs

After thoroughly comparing the Intel Atom X5-E8000 and Celeron N4000 processors, it becomes evident that each has its own strengths and weaknesses. The Intel Atom X5-E8000 is a budget-friendly option with adequate performance for basic computing needs, while the Celeron N4000 offers improved performance, better graphics capabilities, and support for faster memory. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on your specific requirements and budget constraints.

FAQ:

• Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
• A: The Celeron N4000, with its improved graphics capabilities, is a better choice for casual gaming and light video editing compared to the Intel Atom X5-E8000.

• Q: Which processor is more power-efficient?
• A: The Intel Atom X5-E8000 has a lower TDP (5 watts) compared to the Celeron N4000 (6 watts), making it more energy-efficient.

• Q: Which processor is better for multitasking?
• A: The Celeron N4000, with its higher clock speeds and improved multi-core performance, is better suited for multitasking and demanding applications.