Intel Apollo Lake N3350 Vs Intel Celeron N4020: A Comprehensive Comparison Guide For Tech Enthusiasts

In the realm of budget-friendly computing, Intel’s Apollo Lake N3350 and Celeron N4020 processors stand out as compelling options for those seeking a balance between affordability and performance. These low-power processors are designed to cater to everyday computing needs, ranging from basic office tasks and web browsing to casual multimedia entertainment. This comprehensive comparison aims to provide a detailed analysis of the key differences between the Intel Apollo Lake N3350 and Celeron N4020, assisting you in making an informed decision when selecting a processor for your budget-conscious computing needs.

Performance Comparison:

1. CPU Architecture:

• The Intel Apollo Lake N3350 is based on the 14nm manufacturing process and features a quad-core architecture with a base clock speed of 1.1GHz and a turbo boost speed of 2.4GHz.
• The Intel Celeron N4020, built on the more advanced 10nm process, boasts a dual-core architecture with a base clock speed of 1.1GHz and a turbo boost speed of 2.8GHz.

2. Clock Speed:

• The Celeron N4020’s higher base and turbo boost clock speeds provide a slight edge in terms of raw processing power, resulting in faster execution of tasks and improved responsiveness.

3. Multitasking Efficiency:

• The Apollo Lake N3350’s quad-core architecture offers an advantage in multitasking scenarios, allowing for smoother handling of multiple applications running simultaneously.

4. Single-Threaded Performance:

• The Celeron N4020’s higher clock speeds shine in single-threaded applications, where it can outperform the Apollo Lake N3350 in tasks that primarily rely on a single processing core.

Integrated Graphics:

1. Intel HD Graphics 505 vs. Intel UHD Graphics 600:

• The Apollo Lake N3350 features the Intel HD Graphics 505, while the Celeron N4020 comes equipped with the Intel UHD Graphics 600.
• The UHD Graphics 600 offers superior graphics performance, delivering improved visual quality in games and enhanced video playback capabilities.

2. Gaming Performance:

• While neither processor is intended for demanding gaming, the Celeron N4020’s superior graphics capabilities allow it to handle casual games at lower resolutions and settings more effectively.

Power Consumption and Thermal Efficiency:

1. TDP and Power Draw:

• The Apollo Lake N3350 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 6 watts, while the Celeron N4020’s TDP is rated at 6 watts.
• Both processors are highly energy-efficient, making them suitable for compact and fanless devices.

2. Thermal Management:

• The Celeron N4020’s lower TDP and more advanced manufacturing process contribute to better thermal management, resulting in cooler operation and potentially longer battery life in portable devices.

Key Points: Striking a Balance between Performance and Affordability

The Intel Apollo Lake N3350 and Celeron N4020 processors cater to different computing needs and preferences. The Apollo Lake N3350 excels in multitasking scenarios and offers a more affordable option, while the Celeron N4020 delivers superior single-threaded performance, better graphics capabilities, and improved thermal efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on your specific requirements and budget constraints.

Frequently Asked Questions:

1. Which processor is better for basic office tasks and web browsing?

• Both processors are capable of handling basic office tasks and web browsing smoothly. However, the Celeron N4020’s higher clock speeds may provide a slight advantage in terms of responsiveness.

2. Can I play games on these processors?

• While neither processor is designed for demanding gaming, the Celeron N4020’s superior graphics capabilities make it more suitable for casual gaming at lower resolutions and settings.

3. Which processor is more energy-efficient?

• Both processors are highly energy-efficient, with a TDP of 6 watts. However, the Celeron N4020’s lower TDP and more advanced manufacturing process contribute to better thermal management and potentially longer battery life in portable devices.