Home Troubleshooting For CPU & PC Components
Comparison

Unleashing the Beast: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Intel Core i9 10980HK – Which Reigns Supreme?

Isaac Lee is the lead tech blogger for Vtech Insider. With over 10 years of experience reviewing consumer electronics and emerging technologies, he is passionate about sharing his knowledge to help readers make informed purchasing decisions.

What To Know

  • The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is built upon the Zen 4 architecture, while the Intel Core i9 10980HK relies on the Comet Lake architecture.
  • On the other hand, Comet Lake, based on a 14nm process node, offers a more mature architecture, but it may fall short in terms of power efficiency and raw performance compared to Zen 4.
  • On the other hand, if single-core performance and a slightly higher boost clock speed are your primary concerns, the Intel Core i9 10980HK might be a better choice.

Choosing the right CPU for your laptop is a crucial decision that can significantly impact your overall performance and user experience. Two popular contenders in the high-performance segment are the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and the Intel Core i9 10980HK. Both offer impressive capabilities, but which one emerges as the victor in this head-to-head battle? Let’s delve into the intricacies of these processors to determine the ultimate champion.

Core Architecture: A Tale of Two Designs

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is built upon the Zen 4 architecture, while the Intel Core i9 10980HK relies on the Comet Lake architecture. Zen 4 boasts a revolutionary design that emphasizes efficiency and performance. It features a 5nm process node, enabling smaller transistors and higher clock speeds. On the other hand, Comet Lake, based on a 14nm process node, offers a more mature architecture, but it may fall short in terms of power efficiency and raw performance compared to Zen 4.

Core Count and Threading: A Multitasking Showdown

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS boasts 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i9 10980HK packs 8 cores and 16 threads. Both CPUs offer a sufficient number of cores and threads to handle demanding workloads, including multitasking, gaming, and content creation. However, the Zen 4 architecture in the Ryzen 7 8845HS allows for more efficient thread management, potentially leading to smoother performance in scenarios involving multiple applications.

Clock Speeds: A Race to the Top

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS has a base clock speed of 3.0 GHz and a boost clock speed of 4.8 GHz. The Intel Core i9 10980HK, on the other hand, has a base clock speed of 2.4 GHz and a boost clock speed of 5.3 GHz. While the Intel CPU boasts a higher boost clock speed, the Ryzen 7 8845HS’s higher base clock speed can translate to consistent performance across various workloads. Moreover, the Zen 4 architecture’s efficiency allows the Ryzen 7 8845HS to maintain higher clock speeds for extended periods.

Performance: Benchmarking the Best

In real-world performance, both CPUs deliver exceptional results. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS shines in multi-core applications, such as video editing and 3D rendering, thanks to its efficient Zen 4 architecture. The Intel Core i9 10980HK, with its higher boost clock speed, excels in single-core performance, which benefits tasks like gaming and web browsing. However, the Ryzen 7 8845HS’s overall performance, especially in multi-threaded scenarios, often surpasses the Intel Core i9 10980HK.

Power Consumption: A Battle for Efficiency

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is known for its impressive power efficiency. The Zen 4 architecture’s smaller transistors and optimized design contribute to lower power consumption, extending battery life and reducing heat generation. The Intel Core i9 10980HK, while offering high performance, tends to consume more power, potentially leading to shorter battery life and increased heat output.

Integrated Graphics: A Visual Showdown

The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS integrates the Radeon 680M graphics, while the Intel Core i9 10980HK features the Intel UHD Graphics 630. The Radeon 680M offers significantly better performance than the Intel UHD Graphics 630, making it suitable for casual gaming and multimedia tasks. However, for demanding gaming experiences, a dedicated graphics card remains essential.

Key Points: The Verdict is In

The choice between the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and the Intel Core i9 10980HK ultimately depends on your specific needs and priorities. If you prioritize multi-core performance, power efficiency, and integrated graphics capabilities, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS emerges as the clear winner. On the other hand, if single-core performance and a slightly higher boost clock speed are your primary concerns, the Intel Core i9 10980HK might be a better choice.

Basics You Wanted To Know

Q1: Which CPU is better for gaming?
A: While both CPUs offer decent gaming performance, the Intel Core i9 10980HK might have a slight edge due to its higher boost clock speed. However, the difference in gaming performance is usually minimal, and a dedicated graphics card is crucial for optimal gaming experiences.
Q2: Which CPU is more power efficient?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is significantly more power efficient than the Intel Core i9 10980HK, thanks to its Zen 4 architecture and 5nm process node. This translates to longer battery life and reduced heat generation.
Q3: Which CPU is better for video editing?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is a better choice for video editing due to its superior multi-core performance and efficient thread management. Its Zen 4 architecture excels in handling demanding video editing tasks.
Q4: Which CPU is better for multitasking?
A: Both CPUs offer excellent multitasking capabilities, but the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS’s efficient Zen 4 architecture and higher core count make it a slightly better choice for handling multiple demanding applications simultaneously.
Q5: Which CPU is more affordable?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is generally more affordable than the Intel Core i9 10980HK, offering a better value proposition for performance-conscious users.

Was this page helpful?

Isaac Lee

Isaac Lee is the lead tech blogger for Vtech Insider. With over 10 years of experience reviewing consumer electronics and emerging technologies, he is passionate about sharing his knowledge to help readers make informed purchasing decisions.
Back to top button