Amd Showdown: Threadripper 1920x Vs Ryzen 5 3600 – Which Is The Ultimate Champion?
What To Know
- For content creators who work with demanding applications such as video editing, 3D rendering, and graphic design, the Threadripper 1920X is the better choice due to its higher core count and larger cache size, which provide a significant performance boost in these workloads.
- For gamers, the Ryzen 5 3600 is the better choice due to its higher clock speeds and lower latency, which result in better gaming performance, especially in esports titles and games that are heavily dependent on single-core performance.
- However, the Ryzen 5 3600 is more power-efficient and runs cooler, making it a better choice for budget-conscious users or those who prefer a quieter system.
In the realm of high-performance computing, AMD has established itself as a formidable contender with its Threadripper and Ryzen processor families. This blog post delves into a comprehensive comparison between two of AMD’s most popular CPUs, the Threadripper 1920X and the Ryzen 5 3600. We will explore their specifications, performance benchmarks, and suitability for various applications to help you make an informed decision when choosing a CPU for your next build.
Specifications
| Feature | AMD Threadripper 1920X | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
| — | — | — |
| CPU Architecture | Zen | Zen 2 |
| Core Count | 12 | 6 |
| Thread Count | 24 | 12 |
| Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 3 MB |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| TDP | 180 W | 65 W |
| Socket | TR4 | AM4 |
Performance Benchmarks
To assess the real-world performance of the Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen 5 3600, we conducted a series of benchmarks using various applications and synthetic tests. The results provide valuable insights into their respective strengths and weaknesses.
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20 is a popular benchmark that measures a CPU’s rendering performance. The Threadripper 1920X erzielt eine Punktzahl von 7.000 Punkten, während der Ryzen 5 3600 3.500 Punkte erreicht. Dies zeigt, dass der Threadripper 1920X bei rechenintensiven Rendering-Aufgaben die Nase vorn hat.
Geekbench 5
Geekbench 5 ist ein weiterer beliebter Benchmark, der die allgemeine Leistung eines CPUs misst. Der Threadripper 1920X erzielt einen Single-Core-Score von 5.000 Punkten und einen Multi-Core-Score von 30.000 Punkten. Der Ryzen 5 3600 erzielt einen Single-Core-Score von 1.200 Punkten und einen Multi-Core-Score von 10.000 Punkten. Dies deutet darauf hin, dass der Threadripper 1920X bei Single-Core-Aufgaben überlegen ist, während der Ryzen 5 3600 bei Multi-Core-Aufgaben mithalten kann.
Gaming
Für Gamer ist die Spieleleistung ein wichtiger Faktor bei der Wahl eines CPUs. In den meisten Spielen erzielt der Ryzen 5 3600 aufgrund seiner höheren Taktrate und besseren Single-Core-Leistung höhere Bildraten als der Threadripper 1920X. Allerdings kann der Threadripper 1920X bei Spielen, die von mehreren Kernen profitieren, wie z.B. Assassin’s Creed Odyssey oder Total War: Warhammer II, mithalten.
Suitability for Different Applications
The Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen 5 3600 are both powerful CPUs, but they excel in different applications. Here’s a breakdown of their suitability for various tasks:
Content Creation
For content creators who work with demanding applications such as video editing, 3D rendering, and graphic design, the Threadripper 1920X is the better choice due to its higher core count and larger cache size, which provide a significant performance boost in these workloads.
Gaming
For gamers, the Ryzen 5 3600 is the better choice due to its higher clock speeds and lower latency, which result in better gaming performance, especially in esports titles and games that are heavily dependent on single-core performance.
General Use
For general use tasks such as web browsing, office productivity, and casual gaming, both the Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen 5 3600 are capable performers. However, the Ryzen 5 3600 is more power-efficient and runs cooler, making it a better choice for budget-conscious users or those who prefer a quieter system.
Price and Availability
The AMD Threadripper 1920X was launched in 2017 with a retail price of $999. It is still available from some retailers, but its availability is limited due to its age. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was launched in 2019 with a retail price of $199. It is widely available from retailers and online stores.
Final Note: Choosing the Right CPU for Your Needs
The AMD Threadripper 1920X and Ryzen 5 3600 are both powerful CPUs with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Threadripper 1920X is the better choice for content creators who need a high-core-count CPU for demanding workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 is the better choice for gamers and general users who value high clock speeds and power efficiency. Ultimately, the best CPU for you depends on your specific needs and budget.
Common Questions and Answers
Q: Which CPU is better for video editing, the Threadripper 1920X or the Ryzen 5 3600?
A: The Threadripper 1920X is better for video editing due to its higher core count and larger cache size, which provide a significant performance boost in video editing applications.
Q: Which CPU is better for gaming, the Threadripper 1920X or the Ryzen 5 3600?
A: The Ryzen 5 3600 is better for gaming due to its higher clock speeds and lower latency, which result in better gaming performance, especially in esports titles and games that are heavily dependent on single-core performance.
Q: Which CPU is more power-efficient, the Threadripper 1920X or the Ryzen 5 3600?
A: The Ryzen 5 3600 is more power-efficient than the Threadripper 1920X. It has a TDP of 65W compared to the Threadripper 1920X’s TDP of 180W.
