Amd Ryzen 5 2600 Vs Fx 8350: Which One Reigns Supreme In 2023? (benchmark Comparison)
What To Know
- The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is based on the Zen+ architecture, while the FX 8350 is based on the older Piledriver architecture.
- The Ryzen 5 2600 is a better value for the money, as it offers significantly better performance than the FX 8350 for a similar price.
- The Ryzen 5 2600 is also a better value for the money, as it offers significantly better performance than the FX 8350 for a similar price.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and FX 8350 are two of the most popular CPUs in the market today. Both CPUs offer great performance at a reasonable price, but there are some key differences between the two. In this blog post, we’ll compare the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and FX 8350 head-to-head to help you decide which one is the best choice for you.
Architecture
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is based on the Zen+ architecture, while the FX 8350 is based on the older Piledriver architecture. The Zen+ architecture is a significant improvement over the Piledriver architecture, offering better performance and power efficiency.
Core Count and Clock Speed
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the FX 8350 has 8 cores and 8 threads. The Ryzen 5 2600 has a base clock speed of 3.4 GHz and a boost clock speed of 3.9 GHz, while the FX 8350 has a base clock speed of 4.0 GHz and a boost clock speed of 4.2 GHz.
Cache
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 has 16MB of L3 cache, while the FX 8350 has 8MB of L3 cache. The larger L3 cache on the Ryzen 5 2600 gives it a significant advantage in applications that are heavily dependent on cache performance.
Performance
In terms of performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is the clear winner. It outperforms the FX 8350 in both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications. The Ryzen 5 2600 also has a higher IPC (instructions per clock) than the FX 8350, which means that it can execute more instructions per clock cycle.
Power Consumption
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is also more power-efficient than the FX 8350. It has a TDP (thermal design power) of 65W, while the FX 8350 has a TDP of 125W. This means that the Ryzen 5 2600 will consume less power and generate less heat.
Price
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is priced at around $120, while the FX 8350 is priced at around $100. The Ryzen 5 2600 is a better value for the money, as it offers significantly better performance than the FX 8350 for a similar price.
Which One Should You Choose?
If you’re looking for a budget-friendly CPU that offers great performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is the best choice. It outperforms the FX 8350 in both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications, and it’s also more power-efficient. The Ryzen 5 2600 is also a better value for the money, as it offers significantly better performance than the FX 8350 for a similar price.
Summary: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is the Clear Winner
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is the clear winner in this comparison. It offers better performance, power efficiency, and value for the money than the FX 8350. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly CPU that offers great performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is the best choice.
What You Need to Learn
Q: Which CPU is better for gaming, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 or the FX 8350?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is better for gaming than the FX 8350. It offers significantly better performance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded games.
Q: Which CPU is better for streaming, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 or the FX 8350?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is better for streaming than the FX 8350. It offers better performance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications, which is important for streaming.
Q: Which CPU is better for video editing, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 or the FX 8350?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is better for video editing than the FX 8350. It offers better performance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications, which is important for video editing.
