Amd Ryzen 3 Vs Intel Celeron N4020: Which Budget Processor Is The Ultimate Winner?
What To Know
- The Ryzen 3 is a better choice for users who need a processor that can handle demanding tasks, such as video editing, gaming, or programming.
- The Celeron N4020 is a better choice for users who need a basic processor for everyday tasks, such as browsing the web, checking email, and watching videos.
- The Intel Celeron N4020 is a good budget-friendly option for users who need a basic processor for everyday tasks, but it’s not as powerful as the Ryzen 3.
The AMD Ryzen 3 and Intel Celeron N4020 are two of the most popular budget-friendly processors on the market. Both offer solid performance for everyday tasks, but there are some key differences between the two. In this blog post, we’ll take a closer look at the AMD Ryzen 3 and Intel Celeron N4020, comparing their specs, performance, and features. We’ll also help you decide which processor is right for you.
Specs Comparison
The AMD Ryzen 3 and Intel Celeron N4020 are both dual-core processors, but the Ryzen 3 has a higher clock speed (3.2GHz vs. 1.1GHz) and a larger cache (4MB vs. 4MB). The Ryzen 3 also supports faster memory (DDR4-2400 vs. DDR4-2133), which can give it a performance boost in some applications.
| Feature | AMD Ryzen 3 | Intel Celeron N4020 |
| — | — | — |
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Clock Speed | 3.2GHz | 1.1GHz |
| Cache | 4MB | 4MB |
| Memory Support | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2133 |
| TDP | 15W | 6W |
Performance Comparison
In terms of performance, the AMD Ryzen 3 is the clear winner. It offers significantly better performance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications. This makes it a better choice for users who plan to use their computer for demanding tasks, such as video editing, gaming, or programming.
Features Comparison
The AMD Ryzen 3 and Intel Celeron N4020 both offer a range of features, but there are some key differences. The Ryzen 3 supports more modern technologies, such as DDR4 memory and NVMe storage. It also has a more powerful integrated graphics processor, which can provide better performance in games and other graphics-intensive applications.
| Feature | AMD Ryzen 3 | Intel Celeron N4020 |
| — | — | — |
| DDR4 Memory Support | Yes | No |
| NVMe Storage Support | Yes | No |
| Integrated Graphics Processor | Radeon Vega 3 | UHD Graphics 600 |
Price Comparison
The AMD Ryzen 3 and Intel Celeron N4020 are both very affordable processors, but the Ryzen 3 is typically priced slightly higher. This is because it offers better performance and more features.
Which Processor is Right for You?
The AMD Ryzen 3 and Intel Celeron N4020 are both good budget-friendly processors, but they’re best suited for different types of users. The Ryzen 3 is a better choice for users who need a processor that can handle demanding tasks, such as video editing, gaming, or programming. The Celeron N4020 is a better choice for users who need a basic processor for everyday tasks, such as browsing the web, checking email, and watching videos.
The Verdict: AMD Ryzen 3 vs Intel Celeron N4020
The AMD Ryzen 3 is the better processor overall. It offers significantly better performance, more features, and support for modern technologies. The Intel Celeron N4020 is a good budget-friendly option for users who need a basic processor for everyday tasks, but it’s not as powerful as the Ryzen 3.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which processor is better for gaming, the AMD Ryzen 3 or the Intel Celeron N4020?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 is better for gaming. It has a more powerful integrated graphics processor, which can provide better performance in games.
Q: Which processor is better for video editing, the AMD Ryzen 3 or the Intel Celeron N4020?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 is better for video editing. It offers significantly better performance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications, which are both important for video editing.
Q: Which processor is better for programming, the AMD Ryzen 3 or the Intel Celeron N4020?
A: The AMD Ryzen 3 is better for programming. It offers significantly better performance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications, which are both important for programming.
