Amd Ryzen 3 3350u Quad-core Vs I3: Which Is The Better Budget Processor For 2023?
What To Know
- In the realm of budget-friendly computing, the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U and Intel Core i3 processors emerge as formidable contenders, offering a balance of performance and affordability.
- In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the specifications, benchmarks, and real-world performance of the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U and Intel Core i3 processors, helping you make an informed decision.
- The AMD Ryzen 3 3350U’s integrated Vega 8 graphics offer superior performance compared to the Intel UHD Graphics in the Intel Core i3.
In the realm of budget-friendly computing, the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U and Intel Core i3 processors emerge as formidable contenders, offering a balance of performance and affordability. Whether you’re a student, a casual user, or a professional seeking a reliable computing experience, understanding the nuances between these two processors is crucial. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into the specifications, benchmarks, and real-world performance of the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U and Intel Core i3 processors, helping you make an informed decision.
Performance Showdown: Benchmark Analysis
To evaluate the raw performance capabilities of the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U and Intel Core i3 processors, we turn to benchmark tests. These tests provide quantifiable metrics that allow us to compare the processors’ abilities in various tasks.
Geekbench 5:
Geekbench 5 is a widely recognized benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core and multi-core performance. The AMD Ryzen 3 3350U typically scores around 1,100 points in the single-core test and 3,500 points in the multi-core test. The Intel Core i3, on the other hand, averages around 1,000 points in single-core performance and 3,000 points in multi-core performance.
Cinebench R20:
Cinebench R20 is another popular benchmark that focuses on rendering performance. It utilizes the processor’s cores to generate a complex 3D scene, providing a measure of its rendering capabilities. The AMD Ryzen 3 3350U typically scores around 1,500 points in the Cinebench R20 test, while the Intel Core i3 scores around 1,300 points.
PCMark 10:
PCMark 10 is a comprehensive benchmark that simulates real-world productivity tasks, including web browsing, video conferencing, photo editing, and office applications. The AMD Ryzen 3 3350U generally scores around 4,000 points in the PCMark 10 test, while the Intel Core i3 scores around 3,500 points.
Real-World Performance: User Experience Comparison
Beyond benchmark scores, it’s essential to consider the real-world performance of the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U and Intel Core i3 processors. This involves assessing how they handle everyday tasks and applications.
Web Browsing and General Productivity:
Both the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U and Intel Core i3 processors are capable of handling basic tasks such as web browsing, email management, and document editing with ease. However, the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U’s slightly faster clock speeds and improved multi-core performance may provide a smoother experience when multitasking or working with demanding web applications.
Video Conferencing and Streaming:
With the rise of remote work and online learning, video conferencing and streaming have become essential activities. The AMD Ryzen 3 3350U’s integrated Vega 8 graphics offer superior performance compared to the Intel UHD Graphics in the Intel Core i3. This translates to smoother video playback, reduced latency during video calls, and better overall multimedia performance.
Light Gaming and Casual Entertainment:
For casual gamers or those who enjoy light gaming sessions, the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U’s integrated Vega 8 graphics provide a notable advantage over the Intel Core i3’s UHD Graphics. The Vega 8 graphics can handle popular esports titles and older games at playable frame rates, while the UHD Graphics may struggle with more demanding titles.
Power Efficiency and Battery Life
Power efficiency is a crucial consideration for mobile devices, as it directly impacts battery life. The AMD Ryzen 3 3350U is built on a 7nm manufacturing process, which offers better power efficiency compared to the Intel Core i3’s 14nm process. This translates to longer battery life on laptops and other mobile devices powered by the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U.
Price and Availability
The AMD Ryzen 3 3350U and Intel Core i3 processors are both budget-friendly options, with prices typically ranging from $150 to $200. However, the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U is generally more affordable than the Intel Core i3, making it a more attractive choice for value-conscious buyers.
Final Thoughts: Matching Performance with Budget
The AMD Ryzen 3 3350U and Intel Core i3 processors offer compelling options for budget-conscious consumers seeking reliable performance. While the Intel Core i3 provides solid single-core performance, the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U excels in multi-core tasks and offers superior integrated graphics. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize multi-tasking, multimedia performance, and battery life, the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U is the ideal choice. However, if single-core performance is your primary concern, the Intel Core i3 may be a better fit. Regardless of your choice, both processors deliver capable performance for everyday computing tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which processor is better for gaming, the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U or the Intel Core i3?
A: For casual gaming and esports titles, the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U’s integrated Vega 8 graphics offer better performance compared to the Intel Core i3’s UHD Graphics. However, for more demanding games, a dedicated graphics card is recommended.
Q: Can I upgrade the RAM on a laptop with an AMD Ryzen 3 3350U processor?
A: Yes, most laptops with an AMD Ryzen 3 3350U processor allow for RAM upgrades. However, it’s important to check the manufacturer’s specifications and ensure that the laptop supports the type and capacity of RAM you intend to install.
Q: Which processor is better for video editing, the AMD Ryzen 3 3350U or the Intel Core i3?
A: For basic video editing tasks, both processors can handle 1080p video editing with ease. However, for more demanding editing tasks or 4K video editing, a more powerful processor with dedicated graphics is recommended.