Amd Radeon 520 Vs Intel Uhd 630: A Showdown Of Integrated Graphics Performance
What To Know
- The AMD Radeon 520 and Intel UHD 630 are two of the most popular integrated GPUs on the market, offering budget-friendly graphics performance for everyday tasks and light gaming.
- When it comes to gaming, the AMD Radeon 520 and Intel UHD 630 offer varying levels of performance depending on the game and settings.
- While the Intel UHD 630 is more power-efficient and features Intel Quick Sync Video, the AMD Radeon 520 provides better gaming performance and support for AMD’s FreeSync and Eyefinity technologies.
The world of integrated graphics has seen significant advancements in recent years, with AMD and Intel leading the charge. The AMD Radeon 520 and Intel UHD 630 are two of the most popular integrated GPUs on the market, offering budget-friendly graphics performance for everyday tasks and light gaming. In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the specifications, features, benchmarks, and gaming capabilities of these GPUs to determine which one emerges victorious.
The AMD Radeon 520 is based on the GCN (Graphics Core Next) architecture, featuring 512 stream processors clocked at up to 1100MHz. It boasts a memory bandwidth of 64GB/s and supports DirectX 12 and Vulkan APIs. On the other hand, the Intel UHD 630 is built on the Gen9 architecture, packing 24 execution units running at up to 1150MHz. It offers a memory bandwidth of 68GB/s and supports DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.5 APIs.
Performance Benchmarks
In terms of synthetic benchmarks, the AMD Radeon 520 and Intel UHD 630 deliver comparable results. In 3DMark Fire Strike, the Radeon 520 scores around 1400 points, while the UHD 630 manages approximately 1350 points. However, the Radeon 520 pulls ahead in 3DMark Time Spy, achieving a score of 680 compared to the UHD 630’s 550 points.
Gaming Performance
When it comes to gaming, the AMD Radeon 520 and Intel UHD 630 offer varying levels of performance depending on the game and settings. In titles that are less demanding, such as League of Legends or Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, both GPUs can provide playable frame rates at medium or high settings. However, in more graphically intensive games like Fortnite or Apex Legends, the Radeon 520 struggles to maintain consistent performance, often resulting in choppy gameplay. The UHD 630, while not ideal for high-end gaming, can handle these titles at lower settings and resolutions.
Features and Technologies
The AMD Radeon 520 and Intel UHD 630 come with their respective suites of features and technologies. The Radeon 520 supports AMD FreeSync, which eliminates screen tearing and stuttering when paired with a compatible monitor. It also features AMD Eyefinity technology, allowing users to connect multiple displays for an immersive gaming or productivity setup. The Intel UHD 630, on the other hand, offers Intel Quick Sync Video, which accelerates video encoding and decoding tasks, making it a suitable choice for content creators and video editors.
Power Consumption and Thermals
The AMD Radeon 520 and Intel UHD 630 are both energy-efficient integrated GPUs. The Radeon 520 typically consumes around 25 watts of power, while the UHD 630 draws approximately 15 watts. Both GPUs generate minimal heat, making them suitable for compact and passively cooled systems.
Which GPU Should You Choose?
The choice between the AMD Radeon 520 and Intel UHD 630 depends on your specific needs and budget. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly option for basic computing tasks and casual gaming, the Intel UHD 630 is a solid choice. It offers decent performance in less demanding games and excels in video encoding and decoding tasks. However, if you’re planning to play more graphically intensive games or want to take advantage of features like FreeSync and Eyefinity, the AMD Radeon 520 is the better option, despite its higher power consumption.
Conclusion: The Battle of Integrated Graphics
The AMD Radeon 520 and Intel UHD 630 are both capable integrated GPUs that offer basic graphics performance for everyday use and light gaming. While the Intel UHD 630 is more power-efficient and features Intel Quick Sync Video, the AMD Radeon 520 provides better gaming performance and support for AMD’s FreeSync and Eyefinity technologies. Ultimately, the choice between these two GPUs depends on your specific requirements and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. Which GPU is better for gaming, the AMD Radeon 520 or Intel UHD 630?
A1. The AMD Radeon 520 generally offers better gaming performance than the Intel UHD 630, especially in more graphically intensive titles. However, the UHD 630 can handle less demanding games at lower settings and resolutions.
Q2. Does the AMD Radeon 520 support FreeSync?
A2. Yes, the AMD Radeon 520 supports FreeSync technology, which eliminates screen tearing and stuttering when paired with a compatible monitor.
Q3. Does the Intel UHD 630 support 4K video playback?
A3. Yes, the Intel UHD 630 supports 4K video playback at 60Hz. However, it may struggle with 4K gaming or video editing tasks due to its limited graphics capabilities.
Q4. Which GPU is more power-efficient, the AMD Radeon 520 or Intel UHD 630?
A4. The Intel UHD 630 is more power-efficient than the AMD Radeon 520, consuming around 15 watts compared to the Radeon 520’s 25 watts.
Q5. Can I use either GPU for video editing or content creation?
A5. While both GPUs can handle basic video editing tasks, they may not be suitable for professional or intensive content creation workloads. Dedicated graphics cards are recommended for demanding video editing and 3D rendering applications.
