Home Troubleshooting For CPU & PC Components
Guide

Amd Radeon 520 Vs Intel Uhd 620: Which One Offers The Best Bang For Your Buck? [cost-effective Comparison]

Isaac Lee is the lead tech blogger for Vtech Insider. With over 10 years of experience reviewing consumer electronics and emerging technologies, he is passionate about sharing his knowledge to help readers make informed purchasing decisions.

What To Know

  • For example, in the game Dota 2, the UHD 620 gets an average of 60 FPS at 1080p on medium settings, while the Radeon 520 gets an average of 55 FPS.
  • The Radeon 520 supports AMD FreeSync, which is a technology that synchronizes the refresh rate of the monitor with the frame rate of the GPU.
  • However, if you are on a tight budget or if you are looking for a more power-efficient GPU, then the Intel UHD 620 is a good option.

Integrated graphics have become increasingly important in recent years as they offer a cost-effective way to get decent graphics performance without having to purchase a dedicated graphics card. Two of the most popular integrated graphics solutions are the AMD Radeon 520 and the Intel UHD 620. In this blog post, we will compare these two GPUs in detail to help you decide which one is the best for your needs.

Let’s start by taking a look at the specifications of the AMD Radeon 520 and the Intel UHD 620.

Feature AMD Radeon 520 Intel UHD 620
Architecture GCN 4th generation Gen 9
Process 28nm 14nm
Core Clock 1100MHz 1150MHz
Boost Clock 1200MHz 1200MHz
Stream Processors 384 24 EUs
Texture Units 24 24
ROPs 16 16
Memory Interface 64-bit GDDR5 64-bit DDR4
Memory Bandwidth 64GB/s 64GB/s
TDP 25W 15W

As you can see, the AMD Radeon 520 and the Intel UHD 620 have very similar specifications. However, there are a few key differences between the two GPUs. The Radeon 520 has more stream processors and texture units than the UHD 620, which gives it a slight edge in terms of raw performance. The UHD 620, on the other hand, has a lower TDP, which means it is more power-efficient.

Performance

In terms of performance, the AMD Radeon 520 and the Intel UHD 620 are very close. In most games, the Radeon 520 will offer slightly better performance, but the difference is usually not significant. For example, in the game Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the Radeon 520 gets an average of 60 FPS at 1080p on medium settings, while the UHD 620 gets an average of 55 FPS.

However, there are some games where the UHD 620 actually outperforms the Radeon 520. For example, in the game Dota 2, the UHD 620 gets an average of 60 FPS at 1080p on medium settings, while the Radeon 520 gets an average of 55 FPS.

Overall, the AMD Radeon 520 and the Intel UHD 620 offer very similar performance. The Radeon 520 has a slight edge in most games, but the UHD 620 is more power-efficient.

Features

The AMD Radeon 520 and the Intel UHD 620 both support a variety of features, including:

  • DirectX 12
  • OpenGL 4.5
  • Vulkan 1.1
  • OpenCL 2.0
  • AMD FreeSync
  • Intel Quick Sync Video

However, there are a few key differences between the two GPUs in terms of features. The Radeon 520 supports AMD FreeSync, which is a technology that synchronizes the refresh rate of the monitor with the frame rate of the GPU. This can help to eliminate screen tearing and stuttering. The UHD 620, on the other hand, supports Intel Quick Sync Video, which is a technology that accelerates video encoding and decoding. This can be useful for video editors and streamers.

Price

The AMD Radeon 520 and the Intel UHD 620 are both very affordable integrated graphics solutions. The Radeon 520 typically costs around $50, while the UHD 620 typically costs around $40.

Which One Should You Choose?

The AMD Radeon 520 and the Intel UHD 620 are both good integrated graphics solutions. The Radeon 520 offers slightly better performance, while the UHD 620 is more power-efficient. Ultimately, the best GPU for you will depend on your specific needs and budget.

If you are looking for the best possible gaming performance, then the AMD Radeon 520 is the better choice. However, if you are on a tight budget or if you are looking for a more power-efficient GPU, then the Intel UHD 620 is a good option.

Alternatives

If you are looking for an integrated graphics solution that offers better performance than the AMD Radeon 520 and the Intel UHD 620, then you may want to consider the following options:

  • NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  • NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  • AMD Radeon Vega 8
  • Intel Iris Xe Graphics

These GPUs offer significantly better performance than the Radeon 520 and the UHD 620, but they also cost more.

Summary: AMD Radeon 520 vs. Intel UHD 620 – Which is the Right Integrated Graphics Solution for You?

The AMD Radeon 520 and the Intel UHD 620 are both good integrated graphics solutions. The Radeon 520 offers slightly better performance, while the UHD 620 is more power-efficient. Ultimately, the best GPU for you will depend on your specific needs and budget.

If you are looking for the best possible gaming performance, then the AMD Radeon 520 is the better choice. However, if you are on a tight budget or if you are looking for a more power-efficient GPU, then the Intel UHD 620 is a good option.

FAQ

  • Q: Which GPU is better for gaming, the AMD Radeon 520 or the Intel UHD 620?

A: The AMD Radeon 520 offers slightly better gaming performance than the Intel UHD 620.

  • Q: Which GPU is more power-efficient, the AMD Radeon 520 or the Intel UHD 620?

A: The Intel UHD 620 is more power-efficient than the AMD Radeon 520.

  • Q: Which GPU is more affordable, the AMD Radeon 520 or the Intel UHD 620?
  • A: The AMD Radeon 520 and the Intel UHD 620 are both very affordable integrated graphics solutions. The Radeon 520 typically costs around $50, while the UHD 620 typically costs around $40.

Was this page helpful?

Isaac Lee

Isaac Lee is the lead tech blogger for Vtech Insider. With over 10 years of experience reviewing consumer electronics and emerging technologies, he is passionate about sharing his knowledge to help readers make informed purchasing decisions.

Popular Posts:

Back to top button