Amd Phenom Ii X4 965 Vs Ryzen 3 3200g: Which Budget Cpu Reigns Supreme In 2023?
What To Know
- Two notable processors that have made their mark in the industry are the AMD Phenom II X4 965 and the Ryzen 3 3200G.
- In terms of raw performance, the Ryzen 3 3200G generally outperforms the Phenom II X4 965 in most applications and benchmarks.
- The AMD Phenom II X4 965 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 125 watts, while the Ryzen 3 3200G has a TDP of 65 watts.
The world of computer processors has seen remarkable advancements over the years, with AMD and Intel constantly pushing the boundaries of performance and efficiency. Two notable processors that have made their mark in the industry are the AMD Phenom II X4 965 and the Ryzen 3 3200G. This blog post delves into a detailed comparison between these two CPUs, exploring their specifications, performance capabilities, and overall value proposition.
Architecture and Manufacturing Process:
The AMD Phenom II X4 965 is based on the 45nm manufacturing process and utilizes the AM3 socket. It features a quad-core design with a clock speed of 3.4GHz, which can be boosted up to 3.8GHz with Turbo Core technology. On the other hand, the Ryzen 3 3200G is built on the 12nm FinFET process and employs the AM4 socket. It also boasts a quad-core design but operates at a higher base clock speed of 3.6GHz, with a maximum boost clock of 4.0GHz.
Cache and Memory Support:
The Phenom II X4 965 comes equipped with 512KB of L2 cache per core and 6MB of shared L3 cache. As for memory support, it can handle DDR3 memory up to a maximum speed of 1333MHz. In contrast, the Ryzen 3 3200G features 512KB of L2 cache per core and 4MB of shared L3 cache. It supports faster DDR4 memory, with speeds ranging from 2133MHz to 3200MHz.
Graphics Performance:
The AMD Phenom II X4 965 does not have an integrated graphics processor (iGPU), so users will need to purchase a dedicated graphics card to output video signals. On the other hand, the Ryzen 3 3200G incorporates an integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics unit, which provides basic graphics capabilities for casual gaming and everyday tasks.
Performance Comparison:
In terms of raw performance, the Ryzen 3 3200G generally outperforms the Phenom II X4 965 in most applications and benchmarks. The newer Zen architecture and higher clock speeds of the Ryzen 3 3200G result in better single-core and multi-core performance. However, it’s worth noting that the Phenom II X4 965 can still hold its own in certain scenarios, especially when overclocked.
Power Consumption and Efficiency:
The AMD Phenom II X4 965 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 125 watts, while the Ryzen 3 3200G has a TDP of 65 watts. This means that the Ryzen 3 3200G is more power-efficient, consuming less electricity and generating less heat.
Price and Value:
The AMD Phenom II X4 965 is no longer in production and can be found on二手市场. Its price can vary depending on the condition and availability. The Ryzen 3 3200G, on the other hand, is still in production and retails for around $100. Considering its superior performance, integrated graphics, and lower power consumption, the Ryzen 3 3200G offers better value for money.
Final Note:
The AMD Phenom II X4 965 and Ryzen 3 3200G represent two distinct eras of AMD’s processor lineup.
