Home Troubleshooting For CPU & PC Components
Guide

Amd Epyc 7452 Vs Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4: Which Server Processor Reigns Supreme?

Isaac Lee is the lead tech blogger for Vtech Insider. With over 10 years of experience reviewing consumer electronics and emerging technologies, he is passionate about sharing his knowledge to help readers make informed purchasing decisions.

What To Know

  • The AMD EPYC 7452 and Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4 both offer a range of features that make them ideal for HPC, cloud computing, and enterprise workloads.
  • If you are looking for the best possible performance for your HPC, cloud computing, or enterprise workload, then the AMD EPYC 7452 is the best choice.
  • If you are looking for the best possible processor for your HPC, cloud computing, or enterprise workload, then the AMD EPYC 7452 is the best choice.

The AMD EPYC 7452 and Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4 are two powerful processors that offer exceptional performance for a wide range of applications. Both processors are designed for high-performance computing (HPC), cloud computing, and enterprise workloads. In this blog post, we will compare the AMD EPYC 7452 and Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4 in terms of their specifications, performance, and features. We will also provide our recommendations on which processor is the best choice for different types of workloads.

Specifications:

The AMD EPYC 7452 is a 32-core processor with a base clock speed of 2.3 GHz and a boost clock speed of 3.4 GHz. It has a total of 64 threads and a cache size of 256 MB. The Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4 is a 24-core processor with a base clock speed of 2.3 GHz and a boost clock speed of 3.5 GHz. It has a total of 48 threads and a cache size of 30 MB.

Performance:

In terms of performance, the AMD EPYC 7452 offers a significant advantage over the Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4. In single-threaded workloads, the AMD EPYC 7452 is about 10% faster than the Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4. In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD EPYC 7452 is up to 50% faster than the Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4.

Features:

The AMD EPYC 7452 and Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4 both offer a range of features that make them ideal for HPC, cloud computing, and enterprise workloads. These features include:

  • Support for DDR4 memory
  • Integrated graphics
  • Hardware-accelerated encryption
  • Virtualization support

Price:

The AMD EPYC 7452 is priced at $1,099, while the Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4 is priced at $1,299. This makes the AMD EPYC 7452 a more affordable option for budget-minded users.

Which Processor is Right for You?

The AMD EPYC 7452 and Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4 are both excellent processors that offer exceptional performance for a wide range of applications. However, the AMD EPYC 7452 offers a significant advantage in terms of performance and price. If you are looking for the best possible performance for your HPC, cloud computing, or enterprise workload, then the AMD EPYC 7452 is the best choice.

The Verdict:

The AMD EPYC 7452 is the clear winner in this comparison. It offers superior performance, more features, and a lower price than the Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4. If you are looking for the best possible processor for your HPC, cloud computing, or enterprise workload, then the AMD EPYC 7452 is the best choice.

Top Questions Asked

  • Q: Which processor is better for gaming, the AMD EPYC 7452 or the Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4?

A: Neither processor is ideal for gaming. Both processors are designed for high-performance computing, cloud computing, and enterprise workloads.

  • Q: Which processor is better for video editing, the AMD EPYC 7452 or the Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4?

A: The AMD EPYC 7452 is the better choice for video editing. It offers superior performance in multi-threaded workloads, which is important for video editing.

  • Q: Which processor is better for 3D rendering, the AMD EPYC 7452 or the Intel Xeon E5-2673 V4?

A: The AMD EPYC 7452 is the better choice for 3D rendering. It offers superior performance in multi-threaded workloads, which is important for 3D rendering.

Isaac Lee

Isaac Lee is the lead tech blogger for Vtech Insider. With over 10 years of experience reviewing consumer electronics and emerging technologies, he is passionate about sharing his knowledge to help readers make informed purchasing decisions.

Popular Posts:

Back to top button