Amd Epyc 7313 Vs Intel Xeon Gold 6326: Which High-performance Processor Is Right For Your Business?

In the realm of server processors, AMD and Intel have long been engaged in a fierce battle for supremacy. Both companies have released impressive offerings that cater to the diverse needs of enterprise and cloud computing environments. In this blog post, we will delve into a comprehensive comparison between two of their flagship server processors: the AMD EPYC 7313 and the Intel Xeon Gold 6326. We will explore their key features, performance benchmarks, and suitability for various workloads. By the end of this analysis, you will have a clear understanding of which processor emerges as the victor in this head-to-head matchup.

Architecture and Core Count

The AMD EPYC 7313 is based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture, which is known for its high core density and improved performance per core. It boasts a whopping 64 cores and 128 threads, making it a formidable contender in multi-threaded workloads. On the other hand, the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 utilizes the Cascade Lake microarchitecture and features 28 cores and 56 threads. While it may seem like a significant disparity in core count, it is important to note that the Intel processor employs Hyper-Threading technology, which allows each physical core to execute two threads simultaneously.

Clock Speed and Turbo Boost

The AMD EPYC 7313 operates at a base clock speed of 3.0 GHz and can reach a maximum boost clock speed of 3.7 GHz. The Intel Xeon Gold 6326 has a slightly higher base clock speed of 3.4 GHz and a maximum turbo boost frequency of 4.3 GHz. However, it is worth mentioning that the AMD processor has a larger L3 cache (256 MB vs. 19.25 MB), which can provide a significant performance advantage in certain applications.

Memory Support and Bandwidth

Both the AMD EPYC 7313 and Intel Xeon Gold 6326 support eight channels of DDR4 memory. However, the AMD processor has a slightly higher maximum memory capacity of 2 TB compared to the Intel processor’s 1 TB. Additionally, the EPYC 7313 supports faster memory speeds of up to 3200 MHz, while the Xeon Gold 6326 is limited to 2933 MHz. This difference in memory bandwidth can impact the performance of memory-intensive applications.

Performance Benchmarks

To assess the real-world performance of the AMD EPYC 7313 and Intel Xeon Gold 6326, we will examine benchmarks from various sources. In SPECrate2017_int_base, which measures integer performance, the EPYC 7313 erzielt 1139 Punkte, während der Xeon Gold 6326 1023 Punkte erzielt. Dies deutet darauf hin, dass der EPYC 7313 bei integer-lastigen Workloads einen leichten Vorteil hat.

In terms of floating-point performance, as measured by SPECrate2017_fp_base, the EPYC 7313 erzielt 1051 Punkte, während der Xeon Gold 6326 934 Punkte erzielt. Dies deutet darauf hin, dass der EPYC 7313 auch bei Workloads mit hohem Gleitkommaanteil die Nase vorn hat.

Power Consumption and Efficiency

The AMD EPYC 7313 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 225W, while the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 has a TDP of 165W. This means that the EPYC 7313 consumes more power, but it also delivers higher performance. However, the EPYC 7313 also offers better power efficiency, as it can deliver more performance per watt compared to the Xeon Gold 6326.

Suitability for Different Workloads

The AMD EPYC 7313 is well-suited for a wide range of workloads, including virtualization, cloud computing, high-performance computing (HPC), and artificial intelligence (AI). Its high core count and large cache make it ideal for applications that require massive parallelism and memory bandwidth.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6326, on the other hand, is better suited for workloads that benefit from high single-threaded performance and low latency. This includes applications such as databases, ERP systems, and web servers.

Pricing and Availability

The AMD EPYC 7313 is priced at $6,999, while the Intel Xeon Gold 6326 is priced at $4,399. Both processors are readily available from major retailers and online marketplaces.

Wrap-Up: Unveiling the Champion

After an in-depth analysis of the AMD EPYC 7313 and Intel Xeon Gold 6326, it is evident that both processors offer compelling features and performance for a variety of workloads. However, the AMD EPYC 7313 emerges as the clear victor due to its superior core count, larger cache, higher memory bandwidth, and better power efficiency. It is the ideal choice for demanding applications that require massive parallelism and high-performance computing.

Answers to Your Most Common Questions

Q1. Which processor is better for virtualization workloads?

A1. The AMD EPYC 7313 is the better choice for virtualization workloads due to its higher core count, larger cache, and better memory bandwidth.

Q2. Which processor is more suitable for AI and machine learning applications?

A2. The AMD EPYC 7313 is also the better choice for AI and machine learning applications due to its high core count, large cache, and support for faster memory speeds.

Q3. Which processor is more power-efficient?

A3. The AMD EPYC 7313 is more power-efficient than the Intel Xeon Gold 6326, delivering more performance per watt.