Amd Epyc 7232p Vs Epyc 7313p: Which Cpu Delivers The Best Bang For Your Buck?

The AMD EPYC 7000 series processors have revolutionized the server and high-performance computing (HPC) landscape. Among the standout models in this series are the AMD EPYC 7232P and AMD EPYC 7313P processors, which offer exceptional performance and versatility for various demanding workloads. This comprehensive comparison delves into the key specifications, features, and benchmark results of these two processors to help you make an informed decision for your next server or HPC system.

Key Specifications:

Performance Comparison:

1. Integer Performance:

In integer-intensive workloads, the AMD EPYC 7313P slightly edges out the AMD EPYC 7232P due to its higher base clock speed. However, the difference is marginal, and both processors deliver exceptional integer performance.

2. Floating-Point Performance:

When it comes to floating-point operations, the AMD EPYC 7313P takes a clear lead over the AMD EPYC 7232P, thanks to its optimized floating-point units (FPUs). This makes the AMD EPYC 7313P ideal for scientific simulations, engineering analysis, and other applications that heavily rely on floating-point calculations.

3. Memory Bandwidth:

Both processors support eight channels of DDR4 memory, enabling them to achieve impressive memory bandwidth. The AMD EPYC 7313P has a slight advantage in this aspect due to its higher memory clock speed, which allows it to handle memory-intensive workloads more efficiently.

4. Power Consumption:

The AMD EPYC 7232P has a lower TDP (200W) compared to the AMD EPYC 7313P (280W). This makes the AMD EPYC 7232P a more energy-efficient option, especially for data centers and HPC clusters where power consumption is a concern.

Features Comparison:

1. Security Features:

Both processors incorporate AMD‘s Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) technology, which provides hardware-based security enhancements for virtualized environments. This feature helps protect sensitive data and applications from unauthorized access and tampering.

2. RAS Features:

The AMD EPYC 7313P offers more robust RAS (Reliability, Availability, and Serviceability) features compared to the AMD EPYC 7232P. These features include enhanced error detection and correction (EDAC) mechanisms, memory mirroring, and support for hot-plug memory modules.

Benchmark Results:

1. SPECint 2017:

In the SPECint 2017 integer benchmark, the AMD EPYC 7313P scores slightly higher than the AMD EPYC 7232P, demonstrating its superior integer performance.

2. SPECfp 2017:

The AMD EPYC 7313P significantly outperforms the AMD EPYC 7232P in the SPECfp 2017 floating-point benchmark, highlighting its strength in floating-point-intensive applications.

3. STREAM Triad:

The AMD EPYC 7313P delivers higher memory bandwidth than the AMD EPYC 7232P in the STREAM Triad benchmark, indicating its ability to handle large datasets more efficiently.

Key Points:

The AMD EPYC 7232P and AMD EPYC 7313P processors offer exceptional performance and features for a wide range of server and HPC applications. The AMD EPYC 7313P has a slight edge in integer performance, while the AMD EPYC 7232P excels in floating-point operations. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors depends on the specific requirements and workload characteristics of your application.

Common Questions and Answers

1. Which processor is better for gaming?

Both processors are not specifically designed for gaming, and their performance in gaming workloads may vary depending on the game engine and graphics card used.

2. Can these processors be overclocked?

No, both processors do not support overclocking.

3. Which processor is better for video editing?

The AMD EPYC 7313P is a better choice for video editing due to its higher floating-point performance, which is crucial for rendering and processing video content.