Amd E-450 Vs Celeron N3060: Which Is The King Of Budget Processors?
What To Know
- On the other hand, the Celeron N3060, introduced in 2016, is a quad-core processor based on the 14nm process technology.
- The Celeron N3060 boasts a TDP of 6 watts, making it even more power-efficient than the AMD E-450.
- However, if you’re on a tighter budget and basic computing tasks are your primary concern, the AMD E-450 is a viable choice.
In the realm of budget-friendly computing, the AMD E-450 and Celeron N3060 processors stand as two prominent contenders. These low-power, yet capable CPUs have found their niche in affordable laptops, Chromebooks, and mini PCs, catering to users seeking basic computing needs without breaking the bank. In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll delve into the intricacies of each processor, exploring their strengths, weaknesses, and suitability for various tasks.
The Contenders: AMD E-450 vs Celeron N3060
The AMD E-450, released in 2011, is a dual-core processor built on the 45nm process technology. It operates at a base clock speed of 1.65 GHz, with a maximum Turbo Core frequency of 2.3 GHz. The processor features a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 18 watts, making it suitable for compact and energy-efficient devices.
On the other hand, the Celeron N3060, introduced in 2016, is a quad-core processor based on the 14nm process technology. It runs at a base clock speed of 1.6 GHz, capable of reaching up to 2.48 GHz with Intel’s Turbo Boost technology. The Celeron N3060 boasts a TDP of 6 watts, making it even more power-efficient than the AMD E-450.
Performance Comparison: Benchmarking the Contenders
To gauge the real-world performance of the AMD E-450 and Celeron N3060, we’ll examine benchmark results from various sources.
Single-Core Performance
In single-core performance, the Celeron N3060 holds a clear advantage over the AMD E-450. Benchmarks such as Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15 reveal that the Celeron N3060 delivers significantly higher scores, indicating its superior ability to handle single-threaded applications.
Multi-Core Performance
When it comes to multi-core performance, the Celeron N3060 once again outperforms the AMD E-450. Benchmarks show that the Celeron N3060’s quad-core architecture provides a noticeable boost in performance for multi-threaded tasks, such as video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking.
Graphics Performance
Both the AMD E-450 and Celeron N3060 integrate basic graphics capabilities. The AMD E-450 features the Radeon HD 6320 graphics, while the Celeron N3060 utilizes the Intel HD Graphics 400. In terms of performance, the Celeron N3060’s graphics unit is slightly more powerful, enabling it to handle basic gaming and video playback tasks more smoothly.
Power Consumption and Efficiency
The AMD E-450 and Celeron N3060 are both known for their low power consumption. However, the Celeron N3060 takes the lead in terms of energy efficiency. Its 6-watt TDP allows it to operate at lower temperatures and consume less power, making it ideal for devices that prioritize battery life.
Suitability for Different Tasks
Basic Computing
Both the AMD E-450 and Celeron N3060 are suitable for basic computing tasks such as web browsing, email, office productivity, and multimedia playback. However, the Celeron N3060’s superior single-core performance may provide a slightly better user experience for these tasks.
Multitasking
If multitasking is a priority, the Celeron N3060’s quad-core architecture gives it an edge over the AMD E-450. The Celeron N3060 can handle multiple applications running simultaneously more efficiently, allowing for smoother multitasking.
Gaming
Neither the AMD E-450 nor the Celeron N3060 is designed for gaming. However, the Celeron N3060’s slightly more powerful graphics unit may allow it to play some less demanding games at low settings.
Video Editing and 3D Rendering
For video editing and 3D rendering, the Celeron N3060 is the better choice. Its quad-core architecture and higher clock speeds provide a noticeable performance boost for these demanding tasks.
Which Processor Should You Choose?
The choice between the AMD E-450 and Celeron N3060 depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize single-core performance, energy efficiency, and multitasking capabilities, the Celeron N3060 is the better option. However, if you’re on a tighter budget and basic computing tasks are your primary concern, the AMD E-450 is a viable choice.
The Future of Budget Processors
The budget processor market is constantly evolving, with new and more powerful options emerging regularly. As technology advances, we can expect to see even more capable and energy-efficient processors in the future.
Quick Answers to Your FAQs
Which processor is better for web browsing and email?
Both the AMD E-450 and Celeron N3060 are capable of handling basic tasks like web browsing and email. However, the Celeron N3060’s slightly better single-core performance may provide a more responsive experience.
Can I play games on the AMD E-450 or Celeron N3060?
Neither the AMD E-450 nor the Celeron N3060 is suitable for gaming. However, the Celeron N3060’s slightly more powerful graphics unit may allow it to play some older or less demanding games at low settings.
Which processor is more energy-efficient?
The Celeron N3060 is more energy-efficient than the AMD E-450, thanks to its lower TDP (6 watts compared to 18 watts). This makes it a better choice for devices that prioritize battery life.
